ArticleJournal of applied crystallography2020
Near, far, wherever you are: simulations on the dose efficiency of holographic and ptychographic coherent imaging.
Article in Journal of applied crystallography, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Damage-limited resolution for X-ray and electron microscopy of organic specimens.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026Article
- Super Time-Resolved Tomography.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- X-ray near-field multi-slice ptychography for in-situ imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- 4D Synchrotron X‑ray Nanoimaging for Early Age Cement Curing: Where Are We and Where Should We Go?Accounts of materials research · 2025Article
- Experimental comparison of X-ray ptychographic and holographic nanotomography of metal-stained neuronal tissue.Optics express · 2025Article
- Hard X-ray full-field nanoimaging using a direct photon-counting detector.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2023Article
- Upscaling X-ray nanoimaging to macroscopic specimens.Journal of applied crystallography · 2021Review
- Adorym: a multi-platform generic X-ray image reconstruction framework based on automatic differentiation.Optics express · 2021Article
- Fast digital lossy compression for X-ray ptychographic data.Journal of synchrotron radiation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Different studies in X-ray microscopy have arrived at conflicting conclusions about the dose efficiency of imaging modes involving the recording of intensity distributions in the near (Fresnel regime) or far (Fraunhofer regime) field downstream of a specimen. A numerical study is presented on the dose efficiency of near-field holography, near-field ptychography and far-field ptychography, where ptychography involves multiple overlapping finite-sized illumination positions. Unlike what has been reported for coherent diffraction imaging, which involves recording a single far-field diffraction pattern, it is found that all three methods offer similar image quality when using the same fluence on the specimen, with far-field ptychography offering slightly better spatial resolution and a lower mean error. These results support the concept that (if the experiment and image reconstruction are done properly) the sample can be near or far; wherever you are, photon fluence on the specimen sets one limit to spatial resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.