Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32684824›Full record

ReviewReproductive medicine and biology2020

Relationship between nutrition and reproduction.

Fumitoshi Koga, Shigeki Kitagami, Arisa Izumi, Tomoko Uemura, Osamu Takayama, Tsuyoshi Koga, Toru Mizoguchi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Relationship between nutrition and reproduction.Reproductive medicine and biology · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Fumitoshi KogaKoga Fumitoshi Women's Clinic Fukuoka Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8652-5577
Shigeki KitagamiKoga Fumitoshi Women's Clinic Fukuoka Japan.
Arisa IzumiKoga Fumitoshi Women's Clinic Fukuoka Japan.
Tomoko UemuraKoga Fumitoshi Women's Clinic Fukuoka Japan.
Osamu TakayamaKoga Fumitoshi Women's Clinic Fukuoka Japan.
Tsuyoshi KogaKoga Fumitoshi Women's Clinic Fukuoka Japan.
Toru MizoguchiShinjyuku Mizoguchi Clinic Tokyo Japan.
Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, the relationship between nutrition and reproduction is being studied. In particular, when older women receive reproductive treatment, egg aging causes greater problems than organic factors.

methodsThis study investigated the relationship between nutrition and reproduction with a focus on factors that cause aging, including oxidation, glycation, and chronic inflammation. A large volume of data concerning each nutrient's relationship with reproductive medicine was collected from a number of observational studies. MAIN

findingsThe results showed that refined carbohydrates should be avoided and care should be taken to achieve proper intake of omega-3 fatty acids. Folic acid and vitamin D were also effective. For men, antioxidant measures are especially effective. The effects of antioxidants are related to insulin resistance, which causes chronic inflammation.

conclusionRecent research has shown that rather than meal content, meal intervals are more important for improving insulin resistance. Future research should examine lifestyle-related nutrition factors and their relationships to reproductive treatment.

Indexed as

AGEsdietfertilityinsulin resistancenutrition

Identifiers

PMID32684824
PMCPMC7360971
OpenAlexW3034267220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.