Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32684635›Full record

SynthesisMolecular psychiatry2021

A reciprocal inhibition model of alternations between under-/overemotional modulatory states in patients with PTSD.

Toshinori Chiba, Kentaro Ide, Jessica E Taylor, Shuken Boku, Hiroyuki Toda, Tetsufumi Kanazawa, Sumie Kato, Yuka Horiuchi, Akitoyo Hishimoto, Toru Maruyama and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Molecular psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Toshinori Chiba *The Department of Decoded Neurofeedback, Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan.
Kentaro Ide *The Department of Decoded Neurofeedback, Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan.
Jessica E Taylor *The Department of Decoded Neurofeedback, Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan.
Shuken BokuThe Department of Psychiatry, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Hiroyuki TodaThe Department of Psychiatry, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Tetsufumi KanazawaThe Department of Neuropsychiatry, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Sumie KatoChiyoda-Shinryou Clinic, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuka HoriuchiJapan Ground Self-force, Test and Evaluation Command, Military Medicine Research Unit, Tokyo, Japan.
Akitoyo HishimotoThe Department of Psychiatry, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Toru MaruyamaSelf-Defense Forces Central Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Taisuke YamamotoArmy Surgeon, Western Army Headquarters, Japan Ground Self-Defense Force, Kumamoto, Japan.
Miyako ShirakawaFlower of Light Clinic for Mind and Body, Tokyo, Japan.
Ichiro SoraThe Department of Psychiatry, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Mitsuo KawatoThe Department of Decoded Neurofeedback, Computational Neuroscience Laboratories, Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International, Kyoto, Japan.
Ai KoizumiSony Computer Science Laboratories, Inc., Tokyo, Japan. bellkoizumi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8426-4908
Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International · JPKobe University · JPJapan Science and Technology Agency · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPOsaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JPSelf-Defense Forces Central Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) appear to manifest two opposing tendencies in their attentional biases and symptoms. However, whether common neural mechanisms account for their opposing attentional biases and symptoms remains unknown. We here propose a model in which reciprocal inhibition between the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) predicts synchronized alternations between emotional under- and overmodulatory states at the neural, behavioral, and symptom levels within the same patients. This reciprocal inhibition model predicts that when the amygdala is dominant, patients enter an emotional undermodulatory state where they show attentional bias toward threat and manifest re-experiencing symptoms. In contrast, when the vmPFC is dominant, patients are predicted to enter an emotional overmodulatory state where they show attentional bias away from threat and avoidance symptoms. To test the model, we performed a behavioral meta-analysis (total N = 491), analyses of own behavioral study (N = 20), and a neuroimaging meta-analysis (total N = 316). Supporting the model, we found the distributions of behavioral attentional measurements to be bimodal, suggesting alternations between the states within patients. Moreover, attentional bias toward threat was related to re-experiencing symptoms, whereas attentional bias away from threat was related with avoidance symptoms. We also found that the increase and decrease of activity in the left amygdala activity was related with re-experiencing and avoidance symptoms, respectively. Our model may help elucidate the neural mechanisms differentiating nondissociative and dissociative subtypes of PTSD, which usually show differential emotional modulatory levels. It may thus provide a new venue for therapies targeting each subtype.

Indexed as

Stress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAmygdalaEmotionsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingPrefrontal Cortex

Identifiers

PMID32684635
PMCPMC8589665
OpenAlexW3042873092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.