Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32684524›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2020

Effects on alcohol consumption of announcing and implementing revised UK low-risk drinking guidelines: findings from an interrupted time series analysis.

John Holmes, Emma Beard, Jamie Brown, Alan Brennan, Petra S Meier, Susan Michie, Abigail K Stevely, Laura Webster, Penny F Buykx

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John HolmesScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK john.holmes@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-9283-2151
Emma BeardDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Jamie BrownDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Alan BrennanScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Petra S MeierScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Susan MichieDepartment of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Abigail K StevelyScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5637-5245
Laura WebsterScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Penny F BuykxScHARR, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 22962Cancer Research UK C1417/A22962Department of Health 15/63/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn January 2016, the UK announced and began implementing revised guidelines for low-risk drinking of 14 units (112 g) per week for men and women. This was a reduction from the previous guidelines for men of 3-4 units (24-32 g) per day. There was no large-scale promotion of the revised guidelines beyond the initial media announcement. This paper evaluates the effect of announcing the revised guidelines on alcohol consumption among adults in England.

methodsData come from a monthly repeat cross-sectional survey of approximately 1700 adults living in private households in England collected between March 2014 and October 2017. The primary outcomes are change in level and time trend of participants' Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) scores.

resultsIn December 2015, the modelled average AUDIT-C score was 2.719 out of 12 and was decreasing by 0.003 each month. After January 2016, AUDIT-C scores increased immediately but non-significantly to 2.720 (β=0.001, CI -0.079 to 0.099) and the trend changed significantly such that scores subsequently increased by 0.005 each month (β=0.008, CI 0.001 to 0.015), equivalent to 0.5% of the population increasing their AUDIT-C score by 1 point each month. Secondary analyses indicated the change in trend began 7 months before the guideline announcement and that AUDIT-C scores reduced significantly but temporarily for 4 months after the announcement (β=-0.087, CI -0.167 to 0.007).

conclusionsAnnouncing new UK drinking guidelines did not lead to a substantial or sustained reduction in drinking or a downturn in the long-term trend in alcohol consumption, but there was evidence of a temporary reduction in consumption.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingHealth PolicyAdultAlcoholismCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMaleUnited KingdomAlcoholhealth promotionoutcome research evaluationpublic health policytime-series

Identifiers

PMID32684524
PMCPMC7576577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.