ReviewInternational journal of hematology2020
Acute myeloid leukemia during pregnancy: a single institutional experience with 17 patients and literature review.
Review in International journal of hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Acute leukemia during pregnancy: a single center experience with 23 cases, 2012-2022 and literature review.Annals of medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Leukemia during pregnancy and survivorship: gestational age-stratified multidisciplinary management framework.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Review
- Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in 25 pregnant women diagnosed with new-onset acute myeloid leukemia during pregnancy.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- [Diagnosis and treatment of acute leukemia during pregnancy].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022Article
- Arsenic Trioxide Therapy During Pregnancy: ATO and Its Metabolites in Maternal Blood and Amniotic Fluid of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Management of acute myeloid leukemia during pregnancy (P-AML) is a challenging endeavor with limited evidence-based information available. To truly achieve the goal of improving P-AML patients, additional evidence-based research is necessary. We retrospectively reviewed cases of 17 patients diagnosed with P-AML, including seven for acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) from January 2012 to June 2019. Among the non-APL, 90% patients (9/10) ended pregnancy prior to induction chemotherapy. The median intervals between diagnosis and start of chemotherapy were 5 days (range 1-14 days). Four patients elected to delay chemotherapy by more than one week. Of the seven APL patients, six received all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) before the diagnostic molecular results. Five patients underwent cesarean sections (CS) and all newborns were alive (four preterm and one full-term deliveries). Overall, approximately 94% of the patients (16/17) are currently alive in remission. To treat P-AML patients in a safer manner, balancing the risk of progressing to advanced disease and proceeding with pregnancy is required. We consider a slight delay (less than 14 days) in the termination of pregnancy may not differ the prognosis to patients with non-APL. For APL, patients will benefit from prompt administration of ATRA for highly suspected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32683599What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.