Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32683487›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2021

Elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone is a very well tolerated regimen associated with durable remission even in very advanced myeloma: a retrospective study from two academic centers.

Dorothea Hose, Martin Schreder, Jochen Hefner, Max Bittrich, Sophia Danhof, Susanne Strifler, Maria-Theresa Krauth, Renate Schoder, Bettina Gisslinger, Hermann Einsele and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Multiple Myeloma in 2023 Ways: From Trials to Real Life.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Elotuzumab spares dendritic cell integrity and functionality.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorothea HoseDivision of Hematology, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Martin SchrederDivision of Hematology, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Jochen HefnerDivision of Psychosomatic Medicine, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Max BittrichDivision of Hematology, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Sophia DanhofDivision of Hematology, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Susanne StriflerDivision of Hematology, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Maria-Theresa KrauthDepartment of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Renate SchoderDepartment of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bettina GisslingerDepartment of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Hermann EinseleDivision of Hematology, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany.
Heinz GisslingerDepartment of Hematology and Hemostaseology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan KnopDivision of Hematology, Wuerzburg University Medical Center, Würzburg, Germany. knop_s@ukw.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1276-6639
University of Würzburg · DEMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anti-SLAMF7 monoclonal antibody, elotuzumab (elo), plus lenalidomide (len) and dexamethasone (dex) is approved for relapsed/refractory MM in the U.S. and Europe. Recently, a small phase 2 study demonstrated an advantage in progression-free survival (PFS) for elo plus pomalidomide (pom)/dex compared to pom/dex alone and resulted in licensing of this novel triplet combination, but clinical experience is still limited. PURPOSE: To analyze the efficacy and safety of elo/pom/dex in a "real world" cohort of patients with advanced MM, we queried the databases of the university hospitals of Würzburg and Vienna.

findingsWe identified 22 patients with a median number of five prior lines of therapy who received elo/pom/dex prior to licensing within an early access program. Patients received a median number of 5 four-week treatment cycles. Median PFS was 6.4 months with 12-month and 18-month PFS rates of 35% and 28%, respectively. The overall response rate was 50% and 64% of responding patients who achieved a longer PFS with elo/pom/dex compared to their most recent line of therapy. Objective responses were also seen in five patients who had been pretreated with pomalidomide. Low tumor burden was associated with improved PFS (13.5 months for patients with ISS stage I/II at study entry v 6.4 months for ISS III), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. No infusion-related reactions were reported. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia and pneumonia.

conclusionElo/pom/dex is an active and well-tolerated regimen in highly advanced MM even after pretreatment with pomalidomide.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDexamethasoneFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaPrognosisRemission InductionAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDexamethasoneelotuzumabLenalidomidepomalidomideThalidomideElotuzumabLenalidomideMultiple myelomaPomalidomideSLAMF7

Identifiers

PMID32683487
PMCPMC7810646
OpenAlexW3042234103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.