Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32683461›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2020

Post-COVID-19 return to elective orthopaedic surgery-is rescheduling just a reboot process? Which timing for tests? Is chest CT scan still useful? Safety of the first hundred elective cases? How to explain the "new normality health organization" to patients?

Jacques Hernigou, Jérome Valcarenghi, Adonis Safar, Mohamed Amine Ferchichi, Esfandiar Chahidi, Harold Jennart, Philippe Hernigou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. COVID-19 pandemic and elective spinal surgery cancelations - what happens to the patients?The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jacques HernigouOrthopedic Department, EpiCURA Baudour Hornu Hospital, Mons, Belgium.
Jérome ValcarenghiOrthopedic Department, Tivoli hospital, La Louvière, Belgium.
Adonis SafarOrthopedic Department, EpiCURA Baudour Hornu Hospital, Mons, Belgium.
Mohamed Amine FerchichiOrthopedic Department, EpiCURA Baudour Hornu Hospital, Mons, Belgium.
Esfandiar ChahidiOrthopedic Department, Tivoli hospital, La Louvière, Belgium.
Harold JennartOrthopedic Department, Tivoli hospital, La Louvière, Belgium.
Philippe HernigouOrthopedic Department, Clinique Geoffroy Saint Hilaire, 75005, Paris, France. philippe.hernigou@wanadoo.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-8475-279X
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tivoli · BEEpicura · BEInstitut national de l’information géographique et forestière · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe long incubation period and asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 present considerable challenges for health care institutions when patients return to elective surgery.

methodsA retrospective review of the first adult elective cases performed between May 18, 2020 and June 14, 2020, after the end of lockdown was analysed in Belgium to answer the following questions: (1) for the 236 cancelled patients during the outbreak, how easy was rescheduling? (2) How useful was universal RT-PCR testing and chest CT scan for the 211 orthopaedic and trauma admissions? (3) How were surgical difficulty category, number of operations and complications different when compared to the pre-COVID period? (4) How would patients balance the benefit of surgery against the unknown risk of developing COVID-19?

resultsBefore surgery, blood tests for anaesthesiology and imaging related to the surgical procedure were scheduled prior to universal testing (COVID-19 PCR and chest CT) performed 72-120 hours before surgery. Among the 211 asymptomatic patients who were tested before surgery, six had positive PCR, while no abnormality was found on the chest CT scan of all the patients. With this timing for tests, the 104 patients included in the current study for elective surgery were free of disease before undergoing surgery and remained without COVID-19 after surgery. Among the 366 cancelled patients during the outbreak, only 12% of the patients accepted to proceed with rescheduling immediately. Therefore, this resulted in a 70% reduction for elective surgery and in a 50% reduction for arthroplasties as compared to pre-COVID period. The rate of complications was not increased during the post-COVID period. A portion of patients have confused idea of screening and have difficulty to perceive the new rules of health organization.

conclusionsResumption of elective surgical procedures appears more difficult for patients than for surgeons with a low percentage of cancelled patients accepting to reschedule surgery. Universal testing allowed securing patients; however, surgeons must explore better patient perceptions regarding COVID-19 to facilitate a fully informed decision in the current period.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsElective Surgical ProceduresOrthopedic ProceduresPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBelgiumCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedChest CT scanElective surgeryEthicsFractureHip arthroplastyPost-COVID-19Psychological burdenSurgery cancellation

Identifiers

PMID32683461
PMCPMC7368853
OpenAlexW3043429153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.