Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32683453›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2020

UMLS users and uses: a current overview.

Liz Amos, David Anderson, Stacy Brody, Anna Ripple, Betsy L Humphreys

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluating MedDRA-to-ICD terminology mappings.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024
    Article
  7. From Food to Clinic: Mapping FoodOn to the UMLS to Enable Nutritional Decision Support.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024
    Article
  8. Enabling Semantic Topic Modeling on Twitter Using MetaMap.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A GCN-based approach to uncover misaligned synonymous terms in the UMLS Metathesaurus.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liz AmosOffice of the Director, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, USA.
David AndersonLibrary Operations, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, USA.
Stacy BrodyHimmelfarb Health Sciences Library, Reference & Instructional Services, George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.
Anna RippleLister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, USA.
Betsy L HumphreysOffice of the Director, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The US National Library of Medicine regularly collects summary data on direct use of Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) resources. The summary data sources include UMLS user registration data, required annual reports submitted by registered users, and statistics on downloads and application programming interface calls. In 2019, the National Library of Medicine analyzed the summary data on 2018 UMLS use. The library also conducted a scoping review of the literature to provide additional intelligence about the research uses of UMLS as input to a planned 2020 review of UMLS production methods and priorities. 5043 direct users of UMLS data and tools downloaded 4402 copies of the UMLS resources and issued 66 130 951 UMLS application programming interface requests in 2018. The annual reports and the scoping review results agree that the primary UMLS uses are to process and interpret text and facilitate mapping or linking between terminologies. These uses align with the original stated purpose of the UMLS.

Indexed as

National Library of Medicine (US)scoping reviewsurveys and questionnairesterminology (as topic)Unified Medical Language System

Identifiers

PMID32683453
PMCPMC7580803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.