ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
An information-theoretic approach for measuring the distance of organ tissue samples using their transcriptomic signatures.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- State-of-the-art in high throughput organ-on-chip for biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.Clinical and experimental reproductive medicine · 2025Article
- Identifying the effectiveness of 3D culture systems to recapitulate breast tumor tissue in situ.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Article
- MDTR: a knowledge-guided interpretable representation for quantifying liver toxicity at transcriptomic level.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Organoids as tools for fundamental discovery and translation-a Keystone Symposia report.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022Article
- Article
- Revealing potential diagnostic gene biomarkers of septic shock based on machine learning analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Analysis of mRNA‑lncRNA and mRNA‑lncRNA-pathway co‑expression networks based on WGCNA in developing pediatric sepsis.Bioengineered · 2021Article
- Modeling alpha-synuclein pathology in a human brain-chip to assess blood-brain barrier disruption.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Screening of Key Genes of Sepsis and Septic Shock Using Bioinformatics Analysis.Journal of inflammation research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRecapitulating aspects of human organ functions using in vitro (e.g. plates, transwells, etc.), in vivo (e.g. mouse, rat, etc.), or ex vivo (e.g. organ chips, 3D systems, etc.) organ models is of paramount importance for drug discovery and precision medicine. It will allow us to identify potential side effects and test the effectiveness of new therapeutic approaches early in their design phase, and will inform the development of better disease models. Developing mathematical methods to reliably compare the 'distance/similarity' of organ models from/to the real human organ they represent is an understudied problem with important applications in biomedicine and tissue engineering.
resultsWe introduce the Transcriptomic Signature Distance (TSD), an information-theoretic distance for assessing the transcriptomic similarity of two tissue samples, or two groups of tissue samples. In developing TSD, we are leveraging next-generation sequencing data as well as information retrieved from well-curated databases providing signature gene sets characteristic for human organs. We present the justification and mathematical development of the new distance and demonstrate its effectiveness and advantages in different scenarios of practical importance using several publicly available RNA-seq datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The computation of both TSD versions (simple and weighted) has been implemented in R and can be downloaded from https://github.com/Cod3B3nd3R/Transcriptomic-Signature-Distance. CONTACT: dimitris.manatakis@emulatebio.com. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.