ArticleCell death & disease2020
SCF
Article in Cell death & disease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cell-cycle-dependent regulation of DNA end resection by PLK1 and PLK3 without CtIP level modulation.iScience · 2026Article
- Cell-cycle-specific lesion evolution rather than inhibition of double-strand-break repair underpins cisplatin radiosensitization.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Condensins regulate resection-dependent DNA double-strand break repair pathways in replicated chromatin.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- SKP2 in Cancer: From Molecular Regulation to Therapeutic Vulnerabilities and Translational Perspectives.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- SKP2 protein as a prognostic biomarker for glioma and promotes tumor progression by regulating the cell cycle.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Involvement of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the regulation of the tumor microenvironment and progression.Genes & diseases · 2025Review
- Chemical Inhibition of RPA by HAMNO Alters Cell Cycle Dynamics by Impeding DNA Replication and G2-to-M Transition but Has Little Effect on the Radiation-Induced DNA Damage Response.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Article
- PLK1 regulates CtIP and DNA2 interplay in long-range DNA end resection.Genes & development · 2023Article
- Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, a disorder far from solved.Frontiers in aging · 2023Review
- Shift in GCells · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cell cycle-dependent engagement of DNA-end resection at DSBs is regulated by phosphorylation of CTIP by CDKs, the central regulators of cell cycle transitions. Cell cycle transitions are also intimately regulated by protein degradation via two E3 ubiquitin ligases: SCF
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.