Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32683405›Full record

ArticleNeurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia)2020

Spectrum of medulloblastoma subtypes and frequency of MYC amplification; Experience from a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

Ali H Alassiri, Fahd M Alsufiani, Ahmed A Almutairi, Ibrahim A Almohini, Mohammed A Aldosari, Mohammed F Essa

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurosciences (Riyadh, Saudi Arabia), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 92% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali H AlassiriDepartment of Pathology & Lab Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. E-mail: assirial@ngha.med.sa.
Fahd M Alsufiani
Ahmed A Almutairi
Ibrahim A Almohini
Mohammed A Aldosari
Mohammed F Essa
King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo clarify the spectrum of morphological and molecular subtypes of medulloblastoma (MBL), in addition to MYC and MYCN amplification statuses in a cohort of Saudi patients. The latter was correlated with patient outcome.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 57 patients with MBL, diagnosed at the central laboratory of King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between 2006 and 2019. Molecular analysis for MYC and MYCN amplification was performed for the 19 most recently diagnosed patients.

resultsClassic MBL was the most prevalent histologic subtype and MBL with extensive nodularity was the rarest. The non-WNT/non-SHH molecular subgroup was the most common while the WNT-activated was the least common. Among 19 patients analyzed, MYC and MYCN amplifications were discovered in 2 (10.5%) and 1 (5.3%) cases, respectively, using interphase fluorescence in-situ hybridization. The 2 MYC amplified cases belonged to the large cell/anaplastic subtype and had the worst outcomes.

conclusionThe MYC amplification corresponded with poor prognosis, the large cell/anaplastic variant of MBL, and the non-WNT/non-SHH molecular subtype.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultCerebellar NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleGene AmplificationHumansInfantMaleMedulloblastomaMiddle AgedN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycRetrospective StudiesMYCN protein, humanMYC protein, humanN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinProto-Oncogene Proteins c-myc

Identifiers

PMID32683405
PMCPMC8015469
OpenAlexW3038162369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.