Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32683212›Full record

SynthesisJournal of critical care2020

Update I. A systematic review on the efficacy and safety of chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19.

Andrea Cortegiani, Mariachiara Ippolito, Giulia Ingoglia, Pasquale Iozzo, Antonino Giarratano, Sharon Einav

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of critical care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04632719 (MentalPlus® for Assessment and Rehabilitation of Cognitive Functions After Remission of Symptoms of COVID-19), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04632719 nacompletednot on this map

MentalPlus® for Assessment and Rehabilitation of Cognitive Functions After Remission of Symptoms of COVID-19

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2020 to 2023Enrolled200ConditionsCognitive Impairment, Covid19, Cognitive Dysfunction, Depression, AnxietyArmsThe use of the MentalPlus® digital game for assessment and rehabilitation of cognitive function after remission of the symptoms of COVID-19
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Immunomodulatory therapies for COVID-19.Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Pharmacological management of COVID-19 in type 2 diabetes.Journal of diabetes and its complications · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andrea CortegianiDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.), Section of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Italy. Electronic address: andrea.cortegiani@unipa.it.
Mariachiara IppolitoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.), Section of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Italy.
Giulia IngogliaDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.), Section of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Italy.
Pasquale IozzoDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
Antonino GiarratanoDepartment of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Science (Di.Chir.On.S.), Section of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, Policlinico Paolo Giaccone, University of Palermo, Italy.
Sharon EinavIntensive Care Unit of the Shaare Zedek Medical Medical Centre and Hebrew University Faculty of Medicine, Jerusalem, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess efficacy and safety of chloroquine (CQ)/hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) for treatment or prophylaxis of COVID-19 in adult humans. MATERIALS AND

methodsMEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE and two pre-print repositories (bioRxiv, medRxiv) were searched from inception to 8th June 2020 for RCTs and nonrandomized studies (retrospective and prospective, including single-arm, studies) addressing the use of CQ/HCQ in any dose or combination for COVID-19.

resultsThirty-two studies were included (6 RCTs, 26 nonrandomized, 29,192 participants). Two RCTs had high risk, two 'some concerns' and two low risk of bias (Rob2). Among nonrandomized studies with comparators, nine had high risk and five moderate risk of bias (ROBINS-I). Data synthesis was not possible. Low and moderate risk of bias studies suggest that treatment of hospitalized COVID-19 with CQ/HCQ may not reduce risk of death, compared to standard care. High dose regimens or combination with macrolides may be associated with harm. Postexposure prophylaxis may not reduce the rate of infection but the quality of the evidence is low.

conclusionsPatients with COVID-19 should be treated with CQ/HCQ only if monitored and within the context of high quality RCTs. High quality data about efficacy/safety are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsBetacoronavirusChloroquineCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentHumansHydroxychloroquinePandemicsPneumonia, ViralPost-Exposure ProphylaxisProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Antiviral AgentsChloroquineHydroxychloroquineChloroquineCOVID-19HydroxychloroquineMortalitySARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID32683212
PMCPMC7351664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.