Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32682991›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Manipulating the structure of natural scenes using wavelets to study the functional architecture of perceptual hierarchies in the brain.

Alexander M Puckett, Mark M Schira, Zoey J Isherwood, Jonathan D Victor, James A Roberts, Michael Breakspear

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexander M PuckettSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia; Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane QLD 4072, Australia. Electronic address: pucketta@alumni.msoe.edu.
Mark M SchiraSchool of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong NSW 2522, Australia.
Zoey J IsherwoodSchool of Psychology, University of Nevada, Reno NV 89557, United States.
Jonathan D VictorFeil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute and Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York NY 10065, United States.
James A RobertsBrain Modelling Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane QLD 4006, Australia.
Michael BreakspearBrain and Mind PRC, University of Newcastle, Newcastle NSW 2308, Australia.

Funding

CENTRAL PROCESSING OF VISUAL INFORMATIONR01EY007977 · NEI · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI Jonathan D Victor · 1989 to 2026
$9.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY007977
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging experiments that employ naturalistic stimuli (natural scenes, films, spoken narratives) provide insights into cognitive function "in the wild". Natural stimuli typically possess crowded, spectrally dense, dynamic, and multimodal properties within a rich multiscale structure. However, when using natural stimuli, various challenges exist for creating parametric manipulations with tight experimental control. Here, we revisit the typical spectral composition and statistical dependences of natural scenes, which distinguish them from abstract stimuli. We then demonstrate how to selectively degrade subtle statistical dependences within specific spatial scales using the wavelet transform. Such manipulations leave basic features of the stimuli, such as luminance and contrast, intact. Using functional neuroimaging of human participants viewing degraded natural images, we demonstrate that cortical responses at different levels of the visual hierarchy are differentially sensitive to subtle statistical dependences in natural images. This demonstration supports the notion that perceptual systems in the brain are optimally tuned to the complex statistical properties of the natural world. The code to undertake these stimulus manipulations, and their natural extension to dynamic natural scenes (films), is freely available.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleVisual CortexVisual PerceptionYoung Adult3Tdynamic natural scenesfilm stimulifMRIhumanimage processingnatural imagestoolboxVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID32682991
PMCPMC8239382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.