Observational studyAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2021
Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for noninvasive autopsies: experience in >250 human fetuses.
Observational study in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protocol for Post-Mortem Micro-CT Imaging of Coronary Arteries in Low-Mass Neonatal Puppy Hearts Using Barium-Based Contrast.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Miscarriage Tissue Research: Still in Its Infancy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Technologies for Studying and Teaching Human Anatomy: Implications in Academic Education.Medical science educator · 2024Review
- Body weight-based iodinated contrast immersion timing for human fetal postmortem microfocus computed tomography.BJR open · 2024Article
- Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- Post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging with computed tomography-guided biopsy for foetuses and infants: a prospective, multicentre, cross-sectional study.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
- Comparison of postmortem whole-body contrast-enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022Article
- What can we learn from systematic segmental analysis of fetal heart by postmortem micro-CT: Is it time to change approach?International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease · 2022Article
- Postmortem Micro-CT of Human Fetal Heart-A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Micro-CT yields high image quality in human fetal post-mortem imaging despite maceration.BMC medical imaging · 2021Article
- A pragmatic evidence-based approach to post-mortem perinatal imaging.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
- Human fetal whole-body postmortem microfocus computed tomographic imaging.Nature protocols · 2021Article
- Micro-CT Imaging of Pediatric Thyroglossal Duct Cysts: A Prospective Case Series.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2021Article
- Ancillary and Advanced Techniques for the Postmortem Examination.Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNoninvasive imaging autopsy alternatives for fetuses weighing <500 grams are limited. Microfocus computed tomography has been reported as a viable option in small case series with the potential to avoid an invasive autopsy. Implementation of postmortem microfocus computed tomography in a large cohort as part of routine clinical service has yet been unreported, and realistic "autopsy prevention rates" are unknown.
objectiveThis study aimed to describe the range of abnormalities detectable on fetal microfocus computed tomography in a clinical setting and additional findings identified on the antenatal ultrasound and to estimate the invasive autopsy avoidance rate (ie, cases in which imaging was sufficient to deem autopsy unnecessary). STUDY
designA prospective observational case series of all fetuses referred for microfocus computed tomography imaging at a single institution was conducted for 3 years (2016-2019). Imaging was reported by 2 pediatric radiologists before autopsy, with "decision to proceed" based on the specialist perinatal pathologists' judgment and parental consent. Agreement rates between microfocus computed tomography and antenatal ultrasound were evaluated, and where feasible, diagnostic accuracy for microfocus computed tomography was calculated using autopsy as a reference standard.
resultsA total of 268 fetuses were included (2-350 grams body weight; 11-24 weeks' gestation), with cause for demise in 122 of 268 (45.5%). Of the 122 fetuses, 64 (52.5%) exhibited fetal anomalies. Although 221 of 268 (82.5%) fetuses had consent for invasive autopsy, only 29 of the 221 (13.1%) underwent this procedure, which implied an autopsy avoidance rate of 192 of 221 (86.9%). Complete agreement was present for all brain, thoracic, and abdominal pathologies, whereas sensitivity and specificity for cardiac anomalies were 66.7% and 91.7%, respectively. Microfocus computed tomography and antenatal ultrasound agreement was found in 219 of 266 cases (81.9%), with partial agreement in 21 of 266 (7.9%) and disagreement in 26 of 266 (10.5%), mostly because of additional cardiac, soft tissue, or genitourinary findings by microfocus computed tomography, which were not seen on the ultrasound.
conclusionFetal microfocus computed tomography imaging is a viable and useful tool for imaging early gestational fetuses and can avoid the need for invasive autopsy. Confirmation of antenatal diagnoses is achieved in most cases, and additional anomalies may also be detected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.