Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32682860›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2021

Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for noninvasive autopsies: experience in >250 human fetuses.

Susan C Shelmerdine, Ian C Simcock, John Ciaran Hutchinson, Anna Guy, Michael T Ashworth, Neil J Sebire, Owen J Arthurs

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Post-mortem perinatal imaging: what is the evidence?The British journal of radiology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Comparison of postmortem whole-body contrast-enhanced microfocus computed tomography and high-field magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Ancillary and Advanced Techniques for the Postmortem Examination.Pediatric and developmental pathology : the official journal of the Society for Pediatric Pathology and the Paediatric Pathology Society
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan C ShelmerdineDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom; UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: susan.shelmerdine@gosh.nhs.uk.
Ian C SimcockDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom; UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
John Ciaran HutchinsonDepartment of Paediatric Pathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom.
Anna GuyDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom.
Michael T AshworthDepartment of Paediatric Pathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom.
Neil J SebireUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom; Department of Paediatric Pathology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Owen J ArthursDepartment of Clinical Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom; UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, United Kingdom; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Great Ormond Street Hospital · GB

Funding

Department of Health 14/168/02Department of Health CDF-2017-10-037Department of Health ICA-CDRF-2017-03-053Medical Research Council MR/R002118/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNoninvasive imaging autopsy alternatives for fetuses weighing <500 grams are limited. Microfocus computed tomography has been reported as a viable option in small case series with the potential to avoid an invasive autopsy. Implementation of postmortem microfocus computed tomography in a large cohort as part of routine clinical service has yet been unreported, and realistic "autopsy prevention rates" are unknown.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the range of abnormalities detectable on fetal microfocus computed tomography in a clinical setting and additional findings identified on the antenatal ultrasound and to estimate the invasive autopsy avoidance rate (ie, cases in which imaging was sufficient to deem autopsy unnecessary). STUDY

designA prospective observational case series of all fetuses referred for microfocus computed tomography imaging at a single institution was conducted for 3 years (2016-2019). Imaging was reported by 2 pediatric radiologists before autopsy, with "decision to proceed" based on the specialist perinatal pathologists' judgment and parental consent. Agreement rates between microfocus computed tomography and antenatal ultrasound were evaluated, and where feasible, diagnostic accuracy for microfocus computed tomography was calculated using autopsy as a reference standard.

resultsA total of 268 fetuses were included (2-350 grams body weight; 11-24 weeks' gestation), with cause for demise in 122 of 268 (45.5%). Of the 122 fetuses, 64 (52.5%) exhibited fetal anomalies. Although 221 of 268 (82.5%) fetuses had consent for invasive autopsy, only 29 of the 221 (13.1%) underwent this procedure, which implied an autopsy avoidance rate of 192 of 221 (86.9%). Complete agreement was present for all brain, thoracic, and abdominal pathologies, whereas sensitivity and specificity for cardiac anomalies were 66.7% and 91.7%, respectively. Microfocus computed tomography and antenatal ultrasound agreement was found in 219 of 266 cases (81.9%), with partial agreement in 21 of 266 (7.9%) and disagreement in 26 of 266 (10.5%), mostly because of additional cardiac, soft tissue, or genitourinary findings by microfocus computed tomography, which were not seen on the ultrasound.

conclusionFetal microfocus computed tomography imaging is a viable and useful tool for imaging early gestational fetuses and can avoid the need for invasive autopsy. Confirmation of antenatal diagnoses is achieved in most cases, and additional anomalies may also be detected.

Indexed as

Fetal DeathAbnormalities, MultipleAutopsyCohort StudiesFemaleFetusGestational AgeHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray Computedautopsycongenital anomaliesdiagnosismicrofocus computed tomographyminimally invasivemiscarriagepostmortemradiologyterminationvirtual autopsy

Identifiers

PMID32682860
PMCPMC7805479
OpenAlexW3043277614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.