Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32682424›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2020

A cultural and gender-based approach to understanding patient adjustment to chronic heart failure.

Jelena Surikova, Ada Payne, Karen-Lee Miller, Arian Ravaei, Robert P Nolan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A process-based approach to health-related quality of life as a "way of living".Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jelena SurikovaPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, Behavioural Cardiology Research Unit, University Health Network, 585 University Avenue, 6N-618 NU, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3089-0043
Ada PayneCancer Care Ontario, 620 University Ave, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2L7, Canada.
Karen-Lee MillerPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, Behavioural Cardiology Research Unit, University Health Network, 585 University Avenue, 6N-618 NU, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2, Canada.
Arian RavaeiPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, Behavioural Cardiology Research Unit, University Health Network, 585 University Avenue, 6N-618 NU, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2, Canada.
Robert P NolanPeter Munk Cardiac Centre, Behavioural Cardiology Research Unit, University Health Network, 585 University Avenue, 6N-618 NU, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2N2, Canada. rnolan@uhnres.utoronto.ca.
University Health Network · CACancer Care Ontario · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons identifying as Black, Chinese, or South Asian make up the largest minority groups in Canada. Individuals with chronic heart failure (CHF) from these groups experience a greater rate of re-hospitalization and poorer quality of life. Although experts agree that culture can shape the experience of CHF, little is known about how patients from these minority populations define a good quality of life with CHF and what barriers they experience when carrying out self-care behaviours. The aim of this qualitative study was to examine cultural and gender-based influences on quality of life in patients with CHF.

methodsPurposive sampling included 30 patients (67% male), 18 to 75 years of age, who self-identified as Black (n = 8), Chinese (n = 9), or South Asian (n = 6). Caucasians (n = 7) were included as a comparison group. Semi-structured interviews (see the online appendix), lasting approximately 60 min, were conducted, which focused on personal understanding of CHF and living with the disease, including impact on lifestyle and quality of life. An inductive qualitative approach with thematic content analysis was used to develop key insights into individual experience of CHF, as well as cultural and gender-based influences on self-care and quality of life. Descriptive statistics were generated from questionnaire responses.

resultsFive key themes emerged from the narrative analysis of participant interviews: (i) CHF as an emergent reality, (ii) quality of life and disruption of lifecourse milestones, (iii) the challenge to accept CHF and re-evaluation of quality of life; (iv) impact on social activities essential to quality of life, and (v) life with CHF as a commitment to culturally tailored self-care. Participants described the unique impact of CHF on their quality of life, including life trajectory milestones such as dating, parenting, and retirement planning, as well as the importance of accepting their diagnosis, and the reframing goals for living well with heart failure. Positive and negative impacts on social relationships were noted, including sexual intimacy and interactions with spouses, other family members, and co-workers.

conclusionsStudy findings highlight important lifespan, cultural, and gender considerations that can inform the improvement of patient care and quality of life for patients and their families.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalCanadaChronic DiseaseCulturally Competent CareFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeSelf CareSex FactorsChronic heart failureCross-culturalGenderQuality of lifeSelf-care

Identifiers

PMID32682424
PMCPMC7368735
OpenAlexW3043089385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.