Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32682408›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Evaluation of the impact of breastfeeding support groups in primary health CENTRES in Andalusia, Spain: a study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial (GALMA project).

Isabel Rodríguez-Gallego, Fatima Leon-Larios, Cecilia Ruiz-Ferrón, Maria-de-Las-Mercedes Lomas-Campos

Erratum issuedAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. [Sense of coherence in breastfeeding women: A scoping review].Anales del sistema sanitario de Navarra · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isabel Rodríguez-GallegoVirgen del Rocío University Hospital (Seville), Centro Universitario de Enfermería Cruz Roja, University of Seville, Sevilla, Spain.
Fatima Leon-LariosNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, Sevilla, Spain. fatimaleon@us.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9475-0440
Cecilia Ruiz-FerrónNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, Sevilla, Spain.
Maria-de-Las-Mercedes Lomas-CamposNursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, Sevilla, Spain.

Funding

Consejería de Salud, Junta de Andalucía 0008-2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2003, the World Health Organization recommended exclusive breastfeeding (EB) during the newborn's first 6 months of life and, if possible, during the first 2 years. However, EB rates resist these recommendations. In developed countries, only 1 out of 3 babies is breastfed during its first 6 months of life, and great differences between areas and countries can be observed. Only 35% of the newborns receive breastfeeding at 3-4 months of age. There are diverse strategies described in the literature that have proven their efficiency in improving breastfeeding rates. It has also been proven that professional support is an effective tool to extend any kind of breastfeeding; besides, it has been observed that mother-to-mother support also increases breastfeeding initiation, sustainment, and exclusive duration. The overall aim of the study is to assess the impact of the support groups on the sustainment of exclusive breastfeeding until 6 months after birth. METHODS/

designThis study is a cluster-random multicentric clinical trial with a control group and an intervention group, without blinding because it is impossible to mask the intervention. A randomization by centres of primary health (clusters) will be carried out. The women allocated to the intervention or control group will be randomized with a simple randomization sampling. The participants' breastfeeding rate will be followed up at the first 10 days, and at 2, 4, and 6 months of their newborn's life. DISCUSSION: There is a need to assess the impact of mother support groups on exclusive breastfeeding. This study aims to analyse the outcomes related to the support received and to identify what should the structure of these groups be; in other words, to describe factors related to a better breastfeeding experience in order to help women increase breastfeeding rates.

trial registrationThe trial is prospectively recorded at the ISRCTN registry (Trial ID: ISRCTN17263529 ). Date recorded: 17/06/2020.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingMothersPostnatal CareSelf-Help GroupsAdultCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMulticenter Studies as TopicOutcome Assessment, Health CarePregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpainBreastfeedingLactation supportSocial networkSupport group

Identifiers

PMID32682408
PMCPMC7368689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.