ArticleTurkish journal of medical sciences2020
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile in outpatients with respiratory disease
Article in Turkish journal of medical sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- A prospective study of intravenous iron effectiveness on quality of life and functional outcomes in patients with cancer.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Validity and reliability of the persian version of the dyspnea-12 questionnaire in assessing dyspnea among COPD patients.BMC research notes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/aim: Dyspnea is the subjective feeling of breathing discomfort, which is a significant problem for patients with heart and respiratory disease and also an important determinant of exercise tolerance, quality of life, and mortality in various diseases. Most of the scales are not enough to investigate the multidimensional effects of dyspnea; therefore, the Multidimensional Dyspnea Profile (MDP) was developed and validated in many languages. This study aimed to translate and culturally adapt the MDP into Turkish and investigate the psychometric properties of this adapted version in outpatients with respiratory disease. Materials and methods: The MDP was translated and culturally adapted into Turkish following published guidelines. A total of 170 outpatients with respiratory disease were included to assess psychometric properties. The factorial structure was investigated using a principal component analysis. Two situations were used in this study evaluating dyspnea in activity-related and resting conditions. We formulated 17 hypotheses for each MDP domain (in total 68) to assess construct validity, and correlations were investigated between the MDP and measures of body mass index, pulmonary function test, other dyspnea assessments, anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life. To investigate the test-retest reliability, the MDP was administered again after 1-h and 1 week Results: Internal consistency of the MDP was excellent (Cronbach’s alpha coefficients ranged from 0.89 to 0.93). The exploratory factor analysis revealed 2 components explaining a 70% and 76% variance. Overall, 64 of the 68 predetermined hypotheses (94%) were confirmed to test construct validity. The MDP showed excellent test-retest reliability for a 1-hperiod (intraclass correlation coefficient values ranged from 0.98 to 0.99). However, test-retest reliability decreased moderate-to-high after 1 week (0.53–0.80). Conclusion: The MDP was successfully translated and culturally adapted into Turkish and this version showed good psychometric properties including the factorial structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity to assess multidimensional aspects of dyspnea.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.