Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32682281›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pharmacology2020

Evolving understanding of cardiovascular protection by SGLT2 inhibitors: focus on renal protection, myocardial effects, uric acid, and magnesium balance.

Evan C Ray

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Magnesium biology.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Physiology of a Forgotten Electrolyte-Magnesium Disorders.Advances in kidney disease and health · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evan C RayUniversity of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Renal-Electrolyte Division, A915 Scaife Hall, 3550 Terrace St, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, United States. Electronic address: rayec@upmc.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Proteolytic activation of ENaC in Proteinuric Kidney DiseaseK08DK110332 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI RAY, EVAN CROSS · 2016 to 2021
$903k
NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK110332
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robust clinical data indicate that inhibitors of the sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) dramatically improve clinical outcomes in diabetes, especially heart failure and progression of kidney disease. Factors that may contribute to these findings include: 1) improved glycemic control, 2) diuresis and reduced extracellular fluid volume, 3) reduced serum uric acid levels, 3) direct myocardial effects, 4) reduction in proteinuria and preservation of kidney function, and 5) correction of diabetic magnesium deficiency. Understanding the mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors improve cardiovascular outcomes has the potential to improve clinical management not only of diabetes, but also of other cardiovascular disorders such as heart failure and chronic kidney disease.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes ComplicationsHeartHumansKidneyKidney DiseasesMagnesiumProtective AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsUric AcidMagnesiumProtective AgentsSodium-Glucose Transporter 2 InhibitorsUric Acid

Identifiers

PMID32682281
PMCPMC8061532
OpenAlexW3042662343

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.