Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681911›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of ophthalmology2020

Effects of Induced Astigmatism on Spectral Domain-OCT Angiography Quantitative Metrics.

Jesse J Jung, Yu Qiang Soh, Patricia Sha, Sophia Yu, Mary K Durbin, Quan V Hoang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of ophthalmology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Urban-Rural and School-Type Disparities in the Prevalence of Myopia and High Myopia in South India.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Regional choroidal perfusion deficits and vector-based choroidal associations in adolescent astigmatism.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  5. The role of astigmatism in myopia development, myopia progression and myopia control.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesse J JungEast Bay Retina Consultants, Inc., Oakland, California, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Universtiy of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA. Electronic address: jung.jesse@gmail.com.
Yu Qiang SohSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Patricia ShaCarl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, California, USA; Silicon Valley Eyecare Optometry, Santa Clara, California, USA.
Sophia YuCarl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, California, USA.
Mary K DurbinCarl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, California, USA.
Quan V HoangSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore; Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
Carl Zeiss (United States) · USSingapore National Eye Center · SGUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Novel Approaches in the Therapy of Pathologic MyopiaK08EY023595 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HOANG, QUAN VAN MANH · 2014 to 2017
$865k
NEI NIH HHS K08 EY023595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo analyze the effect of induced astigmatism on en-face spectral-domain optical coherence tomography angiography quantitative metrics.

designProspective crossover study.

methodsNormal eyes without astigmatism and with 0.75, 1.75, and 2.75 diopters (D) of with-the-rule (WTR) astigmatism were imaged using a 3 × 3-mm scan pattern SD-OCTA CIRRUS 5000 HD-OCT with AngioPlex (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, CA, USA). Quantitative parameters, including foveal avascular zone metrics, parafoveal vessel length density (VD), and perfusion density (PD) were corrected for magnification secondary to axial length and analyzed. Univariate linear regressions were performed within each eye to correlate quantitative metrics to the level of an induced astigmatic cylinder.

resultsFifteen eyes from 15 patients were imaged. Every 1-D increase in induced WTR astigmatism was associated with a statistically significant decrease in VD and PD within all Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study inner ring quadrants; however, especially more so nasally (VD: 0.63; P < .001; PD: 0.0089; P = .001). For every 1-D increase in induced astigmatism, the resulting decrease in the inner ring superior quadrant was 12% greater for VD and 16% greater for PD versus that in the inferior quadrant. The resulting decrease in the inner ring nasal quadrant was 40% greater for VD and 48% greater for PD versus that in the temporal quadrant.

conclusionsIncreasing levels of induced WTR astigmatism correlated with globally diminishing VD and PD, was more symmetrical for vertical than horizontal quadrants, and was most pronounced nasally. This may be due to a high prevalence of horizontally oriented vessels nasally and the horizontal optical defocus induced by WTR astigmatism.

Indexed as

Fluorescein AngiographyTomography, Optical CoherenceAdultAstigmatismCross-Over StudiesFemaleFovea CentralisHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRetinal VesselsVisual Acuity

Identifiers

PMID32681911
PMCPMC7606665
OpenAlexW3042977956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.