Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681805›Full record

ReviewClinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.)2021

A review of anatomy education during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: Revisiting traditional and modern methods to achieve future innovation.

Joe Iwanaga, Marios Loukas, Aaron S Dumont, R Shane Tubbs

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
19.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 313 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Joe IwanagaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-7952
Marios LoukasDepartment of Anatomy, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2811-6657
Aaron S DumontDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
R Shane TubbsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1317-1047
Tulane University · USKurume University · JPSt. George's University · GD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had enormous effects on anatomy education. During the pandemic, students have had no access to cadavers, which has been the principal way to learn anatomy since the 17th century. As it is difficult to predict future access to cadavers for students or in-person classes, anatomy educators are encouraged to revisit all possible teaching methods in order to develop innovations. Here, we review anatomy education methods to apply to current and future education.

Indexed as

CadaverCOVID-19DissectionEducation, DistanceInventionsPrinting, Three-DimensionalVirtual RealityAnatomyEducation, MedicalHumansPlastinationProblem-Based LearningSocial MediaTeachingTeaching MaterialsVideo Recordinganatomy education, teachingcadaverCOVID-19dissectionmedical educationnovel coronavirusSARS-CoV-2technologyvirtual

Identifiers

PMID32681805
PMCPMC7404762
OpenAlexW3042293459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.