ArticleInternational journal of fertility & sterility2020
Interfering Effects of
Article in International journal of fertility & sterility, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- The impact of melatonin-enriched media on epigenetic and perinatal changes induced by embryo culture in a mouse model.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Embryo vitrification impacts learning and spatial memory by altering the imprinting genes expression level in the mouse offspring' hippocampus.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cryopreservation, cryoprotectants, and potential risk of epigenetic alteration.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Review
- Expression patterns and DNA methylation profile ofAnimal biotechnology · 2023Article
- Can Cryopreservation in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Induce Epigenetic Changes to Gametes and Embryos?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Advantages of vitrification preservation in assisted reproduction and potential influences on imprinted genes.Clinical epigenetics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmbryo vitrification is a key instrument in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs). However, there is increasing concern that vitrification adversely affects embryo development. This study intends to assess the effect of vitrification on developmental competence, in addition to expressions of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) gene trap locus 2 MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this experimental study, we have designed three experimental groups: control (fresh blastocysts collected from superovulated mice),
resultsThe results showed that vitrification group had significantly lower blastocyst and hatching rates compared to the IVF group (P<0.037) and (P<0.041), respectively. Gtl2 was down-regulated and Dlk1 was up-regulated following the IVF and vitrification (P<0.05).
conclusionThese results suggested that IVF and vitrification disturbed genomic imprinting and lncRNA gene expressions, which might affect the health of IVF children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.