Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681572›Full record

ArticleExperimental dermatology2021

Terminal keratinocyte differentiation in vitro is associated with a stable DNA methylome.

Jos P H Smits, René A M Dirks, Jieqiong Qu, Merel A W Oortveld, Arie B Brinkman, Patrick L J M Zeeuwen, Joost Schalkwijk, Huiqing Zhou, Hendrik Marks, Ellen H van den Bogaard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental dermatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Skin epigenetics.Experimental dermatology · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jos P H SmitsDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0915-8624
René A M DirksDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jieqiong QuDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Merel A W OortveldDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Arie B BrinkmanDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Patrick L J M ZeeuwenDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6878-2438
Joost SchalkwijkDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Huiqing ZhouDepartment of Molecular Developmental Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hendrik MarksDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ellen H van den BogaardDepartment of Dermatology, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (RIMLS), Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc), Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4846-0287
Radboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The epidermal compartment of the skin is regenerated constantly by proliferation of epidermal keratinocytes. Differentiation of a subset of these keratinocytes allows the epidermis to retain its barrier properties. Regulation of keratinocyte fate-whether to remain proliferative or terminally differentiate-is complex and not fully understood. The objective of our study was to assess if DNA methylation changes contribute to the regulation of keratinocyte fate. We employed genome-wide MethylationEPIC beadchip array measuring approximately 850 000 probes combined with RNA sequencing of in vitro cultured non-differentiated and terminally differentiated adult human primary keratinocytes. We did not observe a correlation between methylation status and transcriptome changes. Moreover, only two differentially methylated probes were detected, of which one was located in the TRIM29 gene. Although TRIM29 knock-down resulted in lower expression levels of terminal differentiation genes, these changes were minor. From these results, we conclude that-in our in vitro experimental setup-it is unlikely that changes in DNA methylation have an important regulatory role in terminal keratinocyte differentiation.

Indexed as

AdultCell DifferentiationDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA MethylationEpigenomeHumansKeratinocytesTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription FactorsTRIM29 protein, humanDNA methylationepidermal differentiationkeratinocytemethylationEPIC beadchip arrayTRIM29

Identifiers

PMID32681572
PMCPMC8359404
OpenAlexW3043104631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.