Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681537›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2020

Safety perspectives on presently considered drugs for the treatment of COVID-19.

Sophie L Penman, Robyn T Kiy, Rebecca L Jensen, Christopher Beoku-Betts, Ana Alfirevic, David Back, Saye H Khoo, Andrew Owen, Munir Pirmohamed, B Kevin Park and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. SARS-COV-2 MJournal of biomolecular structure & dynamics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Repurposing of Chemotherapeutics to Combat COVID-19.Current topics in medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sophie L PenmanMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Robyn T KiyMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7960-7283
Rebecca L JensenMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1134-2869
Christopher Beoku-BettsSchool of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ana AlfirevicMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
David BackMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Saye H KhooMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Andrew OwenMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Munir PirmohamedMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
B Kevin ParkMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Xiaoli MengMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Christopher E GoldringMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Amy E ChadwickMRC Centre for Drug Safety Science, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7399-8655

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700654Medical Research Council MR/L006758/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intense efforts are underway to evaluate potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of COVID-19. In order to respond quickly to the crisis, the repurposing of existing drugs is the primary pharmacological strategy. Despite the urgent clinical need for these therapies, it is imperative to consider potential safety issues. This is important due to the harm-benefit ratios that may be encountered when treating COVID-19, which can depend on the stage of the disease, when therapy is administered and underlying clinical factors in individual patients. Treatments are currently being trialled for a range of scenarios from prophylaxis (where benefit must greatly exceed risk) to severe life-threatening disease (where a degree of potential risk may be tolerated if it is exceeded by the potential benefit). In this perspective, we have reviewed some of the most widely researched repurposed agents in order to identify potential safety considerations using existing information in the context of COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAntiviral AgentsDrug RepositioningHumansPandemicsRisk AssessmentSafetyAntiviral AgentsCOVID-19drug repurposingdrug safetytoxicology

Identifiers

PMID32681537
PMCPMC7404855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.