ArticleJournal of nephrology2021
Hand function assessment in peritoneal dialysis patient: a pilot study.
Article in Journal of nephrology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is variability among centres regarding the utilization of assisted peritoneal dialysis (PD). Functional impairment is one of the leading causes of assisted PD. Tools to assess the patient's ability to manipulate PD devices are required. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of hand function evaluation in PD patients and to test the association between hand function estimation and assisted PD.
methodsThis was a pilot study of adults treated with PD in a dialysis unit in January 2019. Hand function was evaluated by Purdue Pegboard, Jebsen, Jamar and pinch tests. Relative risks were calculated with a Cox model to evaluate the association between each test and assisted PD.
resultsAmong the 43 PD patients included, 16 were autonomous and 27 were assisted in performing dialysis. The Jebsen and Purdue Pegboard tests were completed by 41 patients (95.3%). All patients succeeded in performing the Jamar and pinch tests. The median time to complete all tests was 22 min. After adjustment based on the Charlson comorbidity index, the assembly test of the Purdue Pegboard (RR 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-0.98]), total Jebsen (RR 1.01 [95% CI 1.00-1.01]) and Jamar test (RR 0.94 [95% CI 0.90-0.99] with the dominant hand; OR 0.94 [95% CI 0.88-0.98] with the non-dominant hand) scores were associated with assisted PD.
conclusionThe evaluation of hand function of PD patients is feasible in daily practice using the Jebsen, Purdue Pegboard, pinch and Jamar tests and may support choosing the appropriate utilization of assisted PD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.