Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681441›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2021

Role and Responsibilities of Supervisors in the Sustainable Return to Work of Workers Following a Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder.

Iuliana Nastasia, Marie-France Coutu, Romain Rives, Jessica Dubé, Sarah Gaspard, Audrey Quilicot

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iuliana NastasiaInstitut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail, OHS Prevention and Rehabilitation, 505 De Maisonneuve Blvd. West, Montreal, QC, H3A 3C2, Canada. iuliana.nastasia@irsst.qc.ca.
Marie-France CoutuSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada.
Romain RivesSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada.
Jessica DubéInstitut de recherche Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail, OHS Prevention and Rehabilitation, 505 De Maisonneuve Blvd. West, Montreal, QC, H3A 3C2, Canada.
Sarah GaspardSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada.
Audrey QuilicotSchool of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Supervisors play an important role during the return to work (RTW) of injured workers. Yet little research has been done on the actions associated with this role or the contexts in which they are taken. The purpose of this study was to develop courses of action to promote supervisors' involvement in the process aimed at achieving sustainable RTW for workers following a work-related musculoskeletal disorder (MSD), and to verify their pertinence, feasibility, and applicability in practice. Methods A two-phase qualitative method was used. (1) Secondary content analysis of 46 interviews of 14 workers post-MSD and 32 other actors in the RTW process, conducted during a prior case study, yielded proposals for courses of action composed of specific actions for supervisors. (2) The pertinence, feasibility, and applicability of these courses of action and specific actions were explored, first, through a self-administered questionnaire to initiate individual reflection, and later in greater depth through focus groups to identify the different contexts in which they might be applicable. Thematic analysis was performed for each phase. Results Eight proposed courses of action, including specific concrete actions and conditions influencing supervisors' involvement, were developed by the researchers and generally perceived as pertinent and feasible by the participants. Several aspects of the organizational context appeared to influence implementation of these courses of action within the organizations. Conclusion Organizational context appears to influence the application of these courses of action, as do the conditions under which they are implemented.

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesReturn to WorkFocus GroupsHumansSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplaceActionDisability managementReturn-to-workRoleWorkplace

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.