ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2020
Expression of SIRT1, SIRT3 and SIRT6 Genes for Predicting Survival in Triple-Negative and Hormone Receptor-Positive Subtypes of Breast Cancer.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Subtype-specific sirtuin expression signatures link mitochondrial-epigenetic networks to breast cancer survival.GeroScience · 2026Article
- All the Way: A Decade of SIRT1 in Breast Cancer.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Review
- 4T1 Cell Membrane Biomimetic Nanovehicle for Enhanced Breast Cancer Treatment.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2025Article
- The Immunohistochemical Prognostic Value of Nuclear and Cytoplasmic Silent Information Regulator 1 Protein Expression in Saudi Patients with Breast Cancer.Biomolecules · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of the prognostic, immunological, and diagnostic roles of SIRT1 in pan-cancer and its validation in KIRC.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Estradiol as the Trigger of Sirtuin-1-Dependent Cell Signaling with a Potential Utility in Anti-Aging Therapies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Identification of prognostic genes signature and construction of ceRNA network in pirarubicin treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2023Article
- The prognostic implications of SIRTs expression in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Discover oncology · 2022Article
- Screening of SIRT6 inhibitors and activators: A novel activator has an impact on breast cancer cells.Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie · 2021Article
- Predictors of Survival Among the Oldest Old Following Acute Hospital Admission: Insights From Clinical and Biochemical Factors.Gerontology & geriatric medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by aggressive phenotype and a poorer prognosis compared to the estrogen and progesterone receptor positive, Her2 negative (ER + PR + Her2-) breast cancer. Increasing evidence suggests that sirtuins, a family of histone deacetylases, could have an important role in aggressiveness of TNBC's. The current study evaluated the potential clinical relevance of SIRT1, SIRT3 and SIRT6 gene expressions in two prognostically distinctive subtypes of breast cancer, the most aggressive TNBC and the least aggressive ER + PR + Her2- tumors. Total RNAs were isolated from 48 TNBC and 63 ER + PR + Her2- tumor samples. Relative gene expression was determined by SYBR Green RT-PCR and delta-delta Ct method, normalized to GAPDH. Mean gene expression of both SIRT1 and SIRT3 was significantly lower in the TNBC compared to ER + PR + Her2- tumors (p = 0.0001). Low SIRT1 and SIRT6 expressions associated with worse overall survival in ER + PR + Her2- patients (p = 0.039, p = 0.006, respectively), while TNBC patients with high SIRT1 tend to have a poor prognosis (p = 0.057). In contrast, high expression of SIRT3 in TNBC patients associated with higher histological grade (p = 0.027) and worse overall survival (p = 0.039). The Cox regression analysis revealed that low SIRT1 expression could be an independent prognostic marker of poor survival in ER + PR + Her2- breast cancers (HR = 11.765, 95% CI:1.234-100, p = 0.033). Observed differential expression of SIRT1, SIRT3 and SIRT6 genes in TNBC and ER + PR + Her2- subtypes, with opposite effects on patients' survival, suggests context-dependent mechanisms underlying aggressiveness of breast cancer. Further investigations are necessary to evaluate sirtuins as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.