Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681415›Full record

ArticleThe journal of primary prevention2020

Bigger Necks Are Not Enough: An Examination of Neck Circumference in Incoming College Athletes.

Carrie Esopenko, Nicola de Souza, Fiona Conway, Sabrina M Todaro, Kyle Brostrand, Jason Womack, Robert Monaco, Jennifer F Buckman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of primary prevention, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carrie EsopenkoDepartment of Rehabilitation and Movement Sciences, School of Health Professions, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, Newark, USA. carrie.esopenko@rutgers.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8607-5633
Nicola de SouzaGraduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Rutgers Biomedical Health Sciences, Newark, USA.
Fiona ConwaySteve Hicks School of Social Work, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
Sabrina M TodaroDepartment of Kinesiology and Health, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, New Brunswick, USA.
Kyle BrostrandRobert Wood Johnson Barnabas Health-Rutgers Sports Medicine, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Jason WomackDepartment of Athletics, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, New Brunswick, USA.
Robert MonacoAtlantic Sports Health, Morristown, USA.
Jennifer F BuckmanDepartment of Kinesiology and Health, Rutgers University-New Brunswick, New Brunswick, USA.

Funding

Deconstructing the temporal and multi-level influences of the baroreflex mechanism on alcohol use behaviorsK02AA025123 · NIAAA · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI BUCKMAN, JENNIFER F. · 2017 to 2021
$762k
NIAAA NIH HHS K02 AA025123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neck circumference is quick and simple to measure and thus an attractive proxy of neck strength, a putative mechanism underlying risk of sport-related concussion (SRC). Research, however, is limited on the relationship of neck circumference to SRC. Our study examined differences in neck circumference based on sex, concussion history, concussions experienced subsequent to college entry, and participation in sports with high versus low risk for contact. Neck circumference was measured in incoming NCAA Division I athletes (N = 324) from a large northeastern university during athlete pre-participation physicals. Sex, sport team, and self-reported concussion history were obtained from retrospective pre-participation questionnaires and medical chart review. Concussion diagnoses during college were collected subsequent to neck measurements from medical chart review. Proportional neck circumference (normalized by body mass index) was computed. Each sport was categorized as involving high or low risk of contact (as a proxy of risk for injury). Sex differences in neck circumference and proportional neck circumference were assessed. Differences in neck circumference and proportional neck circumference were also characterized by contact risk and SRC history (with biological sex included as a covariate). Differences in neck circumference and proportional neck circumference were explored among those who did versus did not experience subsequent SRC diagnosis. Males had significantly larger neck circumference and proportional neck circumference than females. Neck circumference and proportional neck circumference were not related to SRC history or subsequent SRC. Neck circumference is a quick and simple measure; however, even when considered in proportion to body mass, it was unrelated to SRC. Future studies are needed to assess whether this is due to a lack of relationship between the neck and injury or limitations in circumference as a proxy measure of cervical spine characteristics and biomechanics.

Indexed as

AthletesFootballUniversitiesAdolescentAnalysis of VarianceAnthropometryBrain ConcussionFemaleHumansMaleNeckRetrospective StudiesStudentsAthletesConcussionNeck circumferenceSex differences

Identifiers

PMID32681415
PMCPMC7486230

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.