Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681398›Full record

ArticleJournal of religion and health2020

Identifying Moral Injury in Healthcare Professionals: The Moral Injury Symptom Scale-HP.

Sneha Mantri, Jennifer Mah Lawson, ZhiZhong Wang, Harold G Koenig

5 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of religion and health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 112 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
45.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04873622 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Addressing Stress Responses on the Frontline-Further Development of RESTORE (Recovering From Extreme Stressors Through Online Resources and E-health)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Health Network, TorontoRan2021 to 2021Enrolled21ConditionsMental Health, PTSD, Anxiety, Depressive SymptomsArmsRESTORE: Recovering from Extreme Stressors Through Online Resources and E-health
NCT05222685 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Better Together Physician Coaching: An Innovative Solution to Medical Trainee Burnout

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2022 to 2023Enrolled1,017ConditionsBurnout, ProfessionalArmsBetter Together Physician Coaching
NCT05280964 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of a Novel Online Physician Group-Coaching Program to Reduce Burnout in Trainees: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2020 to 2023Enrolled101ConditionsBurnout, Self-compassion, Moral Injury, Impostor PhenomenonArmsBetter Together Physician Coaching
NCT05550753 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Better Together Physician Coaching: Addressing Burnout Amongst Male-Identifying Medicine Trainees

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2023 to 2023Enrolled41ConditionsBurnout, Professional, Self Compassion, Flourishing, Imposter SyndromeArmsBetter Together Physician Coaching Program, No intervention - placebo control
NCT05635448 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Better Together Physician Coaching: Addressing Burnout Amongst Clinicians

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2023 to 2024Enrolled160ConditionsBurnout, Professional, Self Compassion, Flourishing, Imposter SyndromeArmsBetter Together Physician Coaching Program, No intervention - waitlist control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 294 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The Association of Moral Injury and Healthcare Clinicians' Wellbeing: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Resting-State Neural Signatures of Moral Injury: Associations With Rumination.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Sneha MantriDuke University Movement Disorders Center, and Trent Center for Bioethics, Humanities, and History of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Jennifer Mah LawsonFaculty Associate, Trent Center for Bioethics, Humanities, and History of Medicine, and Associate of the Duke Initiative for Science and Society, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
ZhiZhong WangDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, Guizhou, People's Republic of China.
Harold G KoenigDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3400, Durham, NC, USA. Harold.Koenig@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2573-6121
Duke University · USZunyi Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to develop and assess the psychometric properties of a measure of moral injury (MI) symptoms for identifying clinically significant MI in health professionals (HPs), one that might be useful in the current COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. A total of 181 HPs (71% physicians) were recruited from Duke University Health Systems in Durham, North Carolina. Internal reliability of the Moral Injury Symptom Scale-Healthcare Professionals version (MISS-HP) was examined, along with factor analytic, discriminant, and convergent validity. A cutoff score was identified from a receiver operator curve (ROC) that best identified individuals with significant impairment in social or occupational functioning. The 10-item MISS-HP measures 10 theoretically grounded dimensions of MI assessing betrayal, guilt, shame, moral concerns, religious struggle, loss of religious/spiritual faith, loss of meaning/purpose, difficulty forgiving, loss of trust, and self-condemnation (score range 10-100). Internal reliability of the MISS-HP was 0.75. PCA identified three factors, which was confirmed by CFA, explaining 56.8% of the variance. Discriminant validity was demonstrated by modest correlations (r's = 0.25-0.37) with low religiosity, depression, and anxiety symptoms, whereas convergent validity was evident by strong correlations with clinician burnout (r = 0.57) and with another multi-item measure of MI symptoms (r = 0.65). ROC characteristics indicated that a score of 36 or higher was 84% sensitive and 93% specific for identifying MI symptoms causing moderate to extreme problems with family, social, and occupational functioning. The MISS-HP is a reliable and valid measure of moral injury symptoms in health professionals that can be used in clinical practice to screen for MI and monitor response to treatment, as well as when conducting research that evaluates interventions to treat MI in HPs.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsPandemicsPneumonia, ViralStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticAdultAgedCOVID-19HumansMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesBurnoutDepressionHealth professionalsInternal conflictMoral injuryReligiosity

Identifiers

PMID32681398
PMCPMC7366883
OpenAlexW3043061812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.