Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681373›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2021

Fundic gastropexy for high risk of recurrence laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair and esophageal sphincter augmentation (LINX) improves outcomes without altering perioperative course.

Robert Allman, James Speicher, Austin Rogers, Ethan Ledbetter, Aundrea Oliver, Mark Iannettoni, Carlos Anciano

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert AllmanDivision of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, 115 Heart Drive, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
James SpeicherDivision of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, 115 Heart Drive, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Austin RogersDivision of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, 115 Heart Drive, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Ethan LedbetterDivision of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, 115 Heart Drive, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Aundrea OliverDivision of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, 115 Heart Drive, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Mark IannettoniDivision of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, 115 Heart Drive, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA.
Carlos AncianoDivision of Thoracic and Foregut Surgery, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, East Carolina Heart Institute, East Carolina University, 115 Heart Drive, Greenville, NC, 27834, USA. ancianoc14@ecu.edu.
East Carolina University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study is to show that the addition of a fundic gastropexy to a laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (HHR) and magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA) with LINX (Johnson and Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ) in patients with high risk for hiatal hernia recurrence improves outcomes without altering perioperative course.

methodsAn IRB approved, single institution retrospective review of patient outcomes after hiatal hernia repair with magnetic sphincter augmentation was performed. Data were obtained from the electronic health record and stored in a REDCap database. Using statistical software, the patient data were analyzed and stratified to assess the specific variables of the perioperative and postoperative course focusing on the high risk of hiatal hernia recurrence group (HRHR) and low risk hiatal hernia of recurrence group (LRHR). The HRHR group received a gastropexy and were defined using the following variables: comorbid state increasing abdominal pressure, gastric herniation > 30%, maximum transverse crural diameter > 4 cm, age 70 years or older, previous hiatal or abdominal wall hernia repair, BMI > 34, heavy weight bearing job/hobby, and/or emergent repair.

resultsHiatal hernia repair with magnetic sphincter augmentation was performed on 137 patients. The HRHR group (N = 86) and the LRHR group (N = 51) were compared and there was a difference observed with acute hernia recurrence, dysphagia (p value = 0.008), and number of post-op EGDs (p value = 0.005) in favor of the HRHR group. Other postoperative variables observed (i.e., length of stay and PPI use) showed no significant difference between the two groups.

conclusionsFundic gastropexy for individuals who are considered high risk for recurrence does not appear to alter the perioperative course in our sample of patients. The HRHR group has the same length of stay experience and improved postoperative outcomes with reference to postoperative EGD, dysphagia and a decreasing trend in hiatal hernia recurrence.

Indexed as

Gastroesophageal RefluxGastropexyHernia, HiatalLaparoscopyEsophageal Sphincter, LowerHerniorrhaphyHumansInfant, NewbornRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeGastropexyGERDHiatal herniaLINX

Identifiers

PMID32681373
OpenAlexW3042330229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.