Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681347›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021

Patient experience with enhanced recovery and early discharge after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy: a qualitative study.

Sarah Evans, Lindsay Snook, Traci Yates, Henry Bundy, Obafunbi Abimbola, Erinn M Myers

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Enhanced Recovery after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah EvansDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 360, Charlotte, NC, 28207, USA. sarah.k.larkin@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7347-1119
Lindsay SnookDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 360, Charlotte, NC, 28207, USA.
Traci YatesCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Henry BundyCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Obafunbi AbimbolaSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Erinn M MyersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Atrium Health, 2001 Vail Avenue, Suite 360, Charlotte, NC, 28207, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe aim of this study was to describe patient experiences with an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy (SCP).

methodsWe conducted 14 semi-structured telephone interviews with women who had undergone SCP and were discharged the day of the surgery (POD#0, n = 7) or spent 1 night at the hospital (POD#1, n = 7). Interviews occurred between 2 and 6 weeks after surgery. We explored the following topics: patient preparedness, preoperative education, physical recovery, emotional recovery, and overall perception of the ERP. Interviewing continued until thematic saturation was achieved. All interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed to identify relevant themes.

resultsBoth POD#0 and POD#1 discharge patients reported largely positive experiences regarding their preparation for surgery, at-home recovery, and access to follow-up care. Yet for some patients, the accelerated pace of the ERP felt rushed and was perceived as an absence of care rather than as an advance in treatment. Patients that elected to stay the night lived farther from ready access to care, had less robust systems of postoperative support, and worried more about the management of their pre-existing conditions.

conclusionsOur research found that despite having consistently positive impressions of the ERP, patients shared common anxieties surrounding their surgeries including worries about access to care and the prospect of going home with a urinary catheter. Furthermore, we found that the therapeutic value of protocol recommendations such as early discharge must be made explicit to patients and often individualized to avoid being interpreted as sub-standard care.

Indexed as

HospitalsPatient DischargeFemaleHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentPostoperative PeriodQualitative ResearchEnhanced recoveryMinimally invasive sacrocolpopexyPatient experienceQualitative research

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.