Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681319›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2020

Global Gender Differences in Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Random-Effects Meta-Analysis.

Markus M Luedi, Patrick Schober, Verena K Stauffer, Maja Diekmann, Dietrich Doll

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05289297 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Karydakis Flap Procedure Versus Burow's Triangle Advancement Flap Procedure in the Surgical Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Sultanbeyli State HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled80ConditionsPilonidal Sinus, Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal DiseaseArmsKarydakis Flap Procedure, Burow's Triangle Advancement Flap Procedure
NCT05830734 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Examining the Effect of Additional Injection of Freshly Collected Autologous Adipose Tissue to Bascom's Cleft Lift Surgery in the Treatment of Pilonidal Disease- a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2023 to 2026Enrolled140ConditionsPilonidal DiseaseArmsinjection of freshly collected adipose cells, Bascoms Cleft lift procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Time trends in incidence of pilonidal sinus disease from 1996 to 2021: A Danish population-based cohort study.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  9. Closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy after Bascom's cleft lift surgery for pilonidal sinus disease: A randomized study comparing healing.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  10. Long-term outcomes after cleft lift surgery for pilonidal sinus disease in post-pubertal adolescents: data from a prospective Danish cohort.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Use of the laser in the pilonidal sinus alone or in combination with phenol.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Markus M LuediDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Patrick SchoberDepartment of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Verena K StaufferDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Lindenhof Group Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Maja DiekmannDepartment of Procto-Surgery, St. Marienhospital Vechta, Academic Teaching Hospital of the MHH Hannover, Vechta, Germany.
Dietrich DollDepartment of Procto-Surgery, St. Marienhospital Vechta, Academic Teaching Hospital of the MHH Hannover, Vechta, Germany. Dietrich.Doll@kk-om.de.
University of Vechta · DEAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLLindenhofspital · CHUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is traditionally associated with young male patients. While PSD is rare in Asia and Africa, lifestyles are changing considerably throughout the so-called developed world. We question that PSD is an overwhelmingly male disease and that the proportion of women suffering from PSD is worldwide evenly distributed in a homogenous matter.

methodsWe analysed the world literature published between 1833 and 2018, expanding on the database created by Stauffer et al. Following correction for gender bias with elimination of men-only and women-only studies, data were processed using random-effects meta-analysis in the technique of DerSimonian and Laird.

resultsThe share of female pilonidal sinus disease patients analysed from all studies available in the world literature is 21%. There are marked regional differences including South America (39%), North America as well as Australia/New Zealand (29%) and Asia (7%), which are highly significant. These results stand fast even if analysis without gender bias corrections was applied.

conclusionThe share of female patients suffering from PSD is considerable. It is time to think of PSD as a disease of both men and women. Previously unknown, there are significant regional differences worldwide; the reason(s) for the regional differences is still unclear.

Indexed as

Pilonidal SinusSex FactorsFemaleGlobal HealthHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID32681319
OpenAlexW3043811531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.