Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681218›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2021

Screening for depression in movement disorders clinic.

Parviz Bahadoran, Rita Varela, Andrea De Angelis, Dominic Paviour, Niruj Agrawal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Parviz BahadoranAtkinson Morley Regional Neurosciences Centre, St. George's Hospital, London, UK. parviz.bahadoran@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9758-8063
Rita VarelaAtkinson Morley Regional Neurosciences Centre, St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
Andrea De AngelisAtkinson Morley Regional Neurosciences Centre, St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
Dominic PaviourAtkinson Morley Regional Neurosciences Centre, St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
Niruj AgrawalAtkinson Morley Regional Neurosciences Centre, St. George's Hospital, London, UK.
Atkins (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDepression is the most common, though often under-recognised, neuropsychiatric disturbance in movement disorders (MD).

objectiveThis study aimed to establish whether a briefer screening measure such as a visual analogue screening measure (Emotions Thermometer) or Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E) could be a potentially suitable screening tool for depression in MD patients.

methodPatients attending a regional MD outpatient clinic completed the Emotional Thermometer 7-item tool (ET7), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDIE). We used the Major Depression Inventory which provided the diagnosis of depression based on ICD-10 and DSM-IV as our diagnostic gold standard to compare the performance of ET7 and its individual sub-scales, its briefer version ET4, HADS, and NDDIE. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to compare the performance of the screening tools.

resultsIn total, 188 patients were included in the analysis. The most accurate tools as determined by Receiver Operating Characteristics curve were HADS-D for ICD-10 depressive episode and DepT for DSM-IV major depression. ET4 performed well as a 'rule-out' screening tool for both DSM-IV and ICD-10 depression. ET4 performance was comparable to HADS without the need for clinician scoring. The briefer ET4 performed almost as well as ET7.

conclusionEmotions Thermometer and NDDI-E are quick and reliable screening tools for depression in the MD population and are comparable to HADS. We suggest routine use of visual analogue ET4 as it is briefer, requires less time to complete and does not require scoring from the clinicians. It has the potential to be widely implemented across busy neurology clinics to assist in depression screening.

Indexed as

DepressionMovement DisordersAmbulatory Care FacilitiesHumansPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityDepressionDiagnosisMood disorderMovement disorderNeuropsychiatryParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID32681218
OpenAlexW3043427757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.