Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681164›Full record

ArticleHealth policy and planning2020

Hope and trust in times of Zika: the views of caregivers and healthcare workers at the forefront of the epidemic in Brazil.

Clarissa Simas, Loveday Penn-Kekana, Hannah Kuper, Tereza Maciel Lyra, Maria Elisabeth Lopes Moreira, Maria do Socorro Veloso de Albuquerque, Thália Velho Barreto de Araújo, Ana Paula Lopes de Melo, Corina Helena Figueira Mendes, Martha Cristina Nunes Moreira and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health policy and planning, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Clarissa SimasDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Loveday Penn-KekanaDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Hannah KuperInternational Centre for Evidence in Disability, Clinical Research Department, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK.
Tereza Maciel LyraFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães/Fiocruz, Avenida Professor Moraes Rêgo, S/N Cidade Universitária. CEP 50740-465, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Maria Elisabeth Lopes MoreiraInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira/Fiocruz, Avenida Rui Barbosa, 716 - Flamengo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20021-140, Brazil.
Maria do Socorro Veloso de AlbuquerquePostgraduate Programme in public Health, Center of Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco. Avenida Professor Moraes Rêgo, S/N Hospital das Clínicas, Bloco E, 4o.andar. Cidade Unitersitária, CEP 50.670-901, Recife -PE, Brazil.
Thália Velho Barreto de AraújoPostgraduate Programme in Public Health, Center of Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Avenida Professor Moraes Rêgo, S/N Hospital das Clínicas, Bloco E - 4º Andar, Cidade Universitária, CEP: 50.670-901, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Ana Paula Lopes de MeloFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães/Fiocruz, Avenida Professor Moraes Rêgo, S/N Cidade Universitária. CEP 50740-465, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Corina Helena Figueira MendesInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira/Fiocruz, Avenida Rui Barbosa, 716 - Flamengo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20021-140, Brazil.
Martha Cristina Nunes MoreiraInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira/Fiocruz, Avenida Rui Barbosa, 716 - Flamengo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20021-140, Brazil.
Marcos Antonio Ferreira do NascimentoInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira/Fiocruz, Avenida Rui Barbosa, 716 - Flamengo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20021-140, Brazil.
Camila PimentelFundação Oswaldo Cruz, Instituto Aggeu Magalhães/Fiocruz, Avenida Professor Moraes Rêgo, S/N Cidade Universitária. CEP 50740-465, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Marcia PintoInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira/Fiocruz, Avenida Rui Barbosa, 716 - Flamengo, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20021-140, Brazil.
Sandra ValongueiroPostgraduate Programme in Public Health, Center of Medical Sciences, Federal University of Pernambuco, Avenida Professor Moraes Rêgo, S/N Hospital das Clínicas, Bloco E - 4º Andar, Cidade Universitária, CEP: 50.670-901, Recife, PE, Brazil.
Heidi LarsonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article investigates how hope and trust played out for two groups at the forefront of the Zika epidemic: caregivers of children with congenital Zika syndrome and healthcare workers. We conducted 76 in-depth interviews with members of both groups to examine hope and trust in clinical settings, as well as trust in public institutions, in the health system and in the government of Brazil. During and after the Zika epidemic, hope and trust were important to manage uncertainty and risk, given the lack of scientific evidence about the neurological consequences of Zika virus infection. The capacity of healthcare workers and caregivers to trust and to co-create hope seems to have allowed relationships to develop that cushioned social impacts, reinforced adherence to therapeutics and enabled information flow. Hope facilitated parents to trust healthcare workers and interventions. Hope and trust appeared to be central in the establishment of support networks for caregivers. At the same time, mistrust in the government and state institutions may have allowed rumours and alternative explanations about Zika to spread. It may also have strengthened activism in mother's associations, which seemed to have both positive and negative implications for healthcare service delivery. The findings also point to distrust in international health actors and global health agenda, which can impact community engagement in future outbreak responses in Brazil and other countries in Latin America.

Indexed as

EpidemicsZika VirusZika Virus InfectionBrazilCaregiversChildHealth PersonnelHumansLatin AmericaTrustcaregiverscongenital Zika syndromehealthcare workersHopemicrocephalytrustZika virus

Identifiers

PMID32681164
PMCPMC7553755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.