Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681155›Full record

ArticleProstate cancer and prostatic diseases2021

PI-RADS score v.2 in predicting malignancy in patients undergoing 5α-reductase inhibitor therapy.

V Forte, A U Cavallo, R Bertolo, V de Soccio, M Sperandio, P Bove, M Ciccariello

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

V ForteDepartment of Radiology, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy. valerio.forte@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9654-2327
A U CavalloDepartment of Radiology, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy.
R BertoloDepartment of Urology, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0260-4601
V de SoccioDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
M SperandioDepartment of Radiology, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy.
P BoveDepartment of Urology, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy.
M CiccarielloDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Anatomo-Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
Ospedale San Carlo · ITSapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate if the PI-RADS score represents an effective tool in detecting prostate cancer in patients treated with a 5α-reductase inhibitor (dutasteride) and to identify dedicated total serum PSA and PSA density thresholds.

methodsBetween April 2015 and March 2018, 75 patients under dutasteride treatment underwent multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) scans and US/MRI fusion prostate biopsy. Lesions were classified into two groups: Group 1 included PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions, whilst Group 2 included PI-RADS 3-4-5 lesions. Lesions in groups 1 and 2 were further divided according to the patients' history of previous prostate biopsy.

resultsNinety-seven lesions were detected. In PI-RADS 4-5 group, mpMRI showed a sensitivity of 78.0% and a specificity of 78.7%. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 79.6% and the negative predictive value (NPV) 77.1%. In PI-RADS 3-4-5 group, sensitivity was 100%, specificity 21.3%, PPV 57.5%, NPV 100%. In PI-RADS 4-5 biopsy-naive group sensitivity was 71.4%, specificity 75.0%. PPV 78.9% and NPV 66.7%. In PI-RADS 4-5 non-biopsy-naive group sensitivity was 82.8%, specificity 80.6%, PPV 80%, and NPV 83.3%. PI-RADS 3-4-5 biopsy-naive group showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 31.3%, PPV 65.6%, NPV 100%. PI-RADS 3-4-5 non-biopsy-naive group showed sensitivity 100%, specificity 16.1%, PPV 52.7%, and NPV 100%. ROC curve analysis indicated a serum total PSA threshold of 6 ng/ml (AUC: 0.71-95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.81) and a PSA density >0.22 (AUC: 0.70-95% confidence interval: 0.6-0.81) as optimal cut-offs for recommending prostate biopsy.

conclusionsIn our experience the PI-RADS score proved to be sufficiently accurate in predicting prostate cancer in patients under dutasteride therapy.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Grading5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyDutasterideFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic Neoplasms5-alpha Reductase InhibitorsBiomarkers, TumorDutasterideProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID32681155
OpenAlexW3042779825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.