Trial reportScientific reports2020
Reliability and suitability of physiological exercise response and recovery markers.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of antidepressant administration on physical performance and perceived exertion in athletes: systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Exercise training mode effects on myokine expression in healthy adults: A systematic review with meta-analysis.Journal of sport and health science · 2024Pooled it
- Review
- Monitoring Training Effects in Athletes: A Multidimensional Framework for Decision-Making.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
- Functionalized Quantum Dot-Based Portable Sensor for Dual Detection of Stress Biomarkers in Blood Serum and Saliva.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- Article
- Physiological, Performance, and Oxidative Stress Responses to High-Intensity Uphill and Downhill Interval Training.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Advancing the allostatic load model in military training research: from theory to application.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Review
- The Impact of Surgery-Related Emotional Distress on Long-Term Outcome After Colorectal Surgery: An Observational Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Metabolic Phenotyping from Whole-Blood Responses to a Standardized Exercise Test May Discriminate for Physiological, Performance, and Illness Outcomes: A Pilot Study in Highly-Trained Cross-Country Skiers.Sports medicine - open · 2024Article
- Analysis and study on biomarkers of local muscle fatigue caused by repetitive lifting task.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Exploring sex differences in blood-based biomarkers following exhaustive exercise using bioinformatics analysis.Biology of sport · 2024Article
- Construction of neural network model for exercise load monitoring based on yoga training data and rehabilitation therapy.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Effect of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin and Irisin on Post-Exercise Inflammatory Response: A Narrative Review.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2024Review
- Reduction in systemic muscle stress markers after exercise-induced muscle damage following concurrent training and supplementation with specific collagen peptides - a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Article
- Blood-Based Biomarkers for Managing Workload in Athletes: Perspectives for Research on Emerging Biomarkers.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- Blood-Based Biomarkers for Managing Workload in Athletes: Considerations and Recommendations for Evidence-Based Use of Established Biomarkers.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2023Review
- Exercise, exerkines, and cardiometabolic health: from individual players to a team sport.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is currently insufficient evidence about the reliable quantification of exercise load and athlete's recovery management for monitoring training processes. Therefore, this test-retest study investigated the reliability of various subjective, muscle force, and blood-based parameters in order to evaluate their suitability for monitoring exercise and recovery cycles. 62 subjects completed two identical 60-min continuous endurance exercise bouts intermitted by a four-week recovery period. Before, immediately after, three, and 24 h after each exercise bout, analysis of parameters were performed. Significant changes over time were found for rating of perceived exertion (RPE), multidimensional mood state questionnaire (MDMQ), maximum voluntary contraction parameters (MVCs), and blood-based biomarkers (p < 0.05). Excellent reliability was calculated for MVCs, mean corpuscular volume and 5-bound distance (ICC > 0.90). A good reliability was found for thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) (ICC = 0.79) and haematological markers (ICC = 0.75-0.86). For RPE, MDMQ, interleukin (IL-) 1RA, IL-6, IL-8, IL-15, cortisol, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK) only moderate reliability was found (ICC < 0.75). Significant associations for IL1-RA and CK to MVC were found. The excellent to moderate reliability of TBARS, LDH, IL-1RA, six measured haematological markers, MVCs and MDMQ implicate their suitability as physiological exercise response and recovery markers for monitoring athletes' load management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.