Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681101›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Neurocognitive patterns dissociating semantic processing from executive control are linked to more detailed off-task mental time travel.

Hao-Ting Wang, Nerissa Siu Ping Ho, Danilo Bzdok, Boris C Bernhardt, Daniel S Margulies, Elizabeth Jefferies, Jonathan Smallwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sender-receiver subdivisions of the default mode network in perceptual and memory-guided cognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. How to Interpret Resting-State fMRI: Ask Your Participants.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hao-Ting WangSackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. H.Wang@bsms.ac.uk.
Nerissa Siu Ping HoDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.
Danilo BzdokDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, McConnell Brain Imagine Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Boris C BernhardtDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McConnell Brain Imaging Centre, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Daniel S MarguliesFrontlab, Institut du Cerveau Et de La Moelle épinière, Paris, France.
Elizabeth JefferiesDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

CIHR FDN-154298European Research Council 646927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Features of ongoing experience are common across individuals and cultures. However, certain people express specific patterns of thought to a greater extent than others. Contemporary psychological theory assumes that individual differences in thought patterns occur because different types of experience depend on the expression of different neurocognitive processes. Consequently, individual variation in the underlying neurocognitive architecture is hypothesised to determine the ease with which certain thought patterns are generated or maintained. Our study (N = 178) tested this hypothesis using multivariate pattern analysis to infer shared variance among measures of cognitive function and neural organisation and examined whether these latent variables explained reports of the patterns of on-going thoughts people experienced in the lab. We found that relatively better performance on tasks relying primarily on semantic knowledge, rather than executive control, was linked to a neural functional organisation associated, via meta-analysis, with task labels related to semantic associations (sentence processing, reading and verbal semantics). Variability of this functional mode predicted significant individual variation in the types of thoughts that individuals experienced in the laboratory: neurocognitive patterns linked to better performance at tasks that required guidance from semantic representation, rather than those dependent on executive control, were associated with patterns of thought characterised by greater subjective detail and a focus on time periods other than the here and now. These relationships were consistent across different days and did not vary with level of task demands, indicating they are relatively stable features of an individual's cognitive profile. Together these data confirm that individual variation in aspects of ongoing experience can be inferred from hidden neurocognitive architecture and demonstrate that performance trade-offs between executive control and long-term semantic knowledge are linked to a person's tendency to imagine situations that transcend the here and now.

Indexed as

SemanticsTask Performance and AnalysisAdolescentAdultBrain Cortical ThicknessCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32681101
PMCPMC7368037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.