Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32681071›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Sex differences in visuomotor tracking.

James Mathew, Guillaume S Masson, Frederic R Danion

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects of verbal tasks on driving simulator performance.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

James MathewInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, CNRS and Aix Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine de la Timone, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5315-5212
Guillaume S MassonInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, CNRS and Aix Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine de la Timone, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9227-0777
Frederic R DanionInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone UMR 7289, CNRS and Aix Marseille Université, Faculté de Médecine de la Timone, 27 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005, Marseille, France. frederic.danion@univ-amu.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4296-7300
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a growing interest in sex differences in human and animal cognition. However, empirical evidences supporting behavioral and neural sex differences in humans remain sparse. Visuomotor behaviors offer a robust and naturalistic empirical framework to seek for the computational mechanisms underlying sex biases in cognition. In a large group of human participants (N = 127), we investigated sex differences in a visuo-oculo-manual motor task that consists of tracking with the hand a target moving unpredictably. We report a clear male advantage in hand tracking accuracy. We tested whether men and women employ different gaze strategy or hand movement kinematics. Results show no key difference in these distinct visuomotor components. However, highly consistent differences in eye-hand coordination were evidenced by a larger temporal lag between hand motion and target motion in women. This observation echoes with other studies showing a male advantage in manual reaction time to visual stimuli. We propose that the male advantage for visuomotor tracking does not reside in a more reliable gaze strategy, or in more sophisticated hand movements, but rather in a faster decisional process linking visual information about target motion with forthcoming hand, but not eye, actions.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsPsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAdultAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCognitionFemaleFixation, OcularHumansMaleSex FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32681071
PMCPMC7368072
OpenAlexW3042820443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.