Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32680938›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2020

Adaptation to Noise in Human Speech Recognition Depends on Noise-Level Statistics and Fast Dynamic-Range Compression.

Miriam I Marrufo-Pérez, Dora Del Pilar Sturla-Carreto, Almudena Eustaquio-Martín, Enrique A Lopez-Poveda

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Adaptation in auditory processing.Physiological reviews · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Listening in complex acoustic scenes.Current opinion in physiology · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miriam I Marrufo-PérezInstituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Dora Del Pilar Sturla-CarretoInstituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Almudena Eustaquio-MartínInstituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Enrique A Lopez-PovedaInstituto de Neurociencias de Castilla y León, Universidad de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain ealopezpoveda@usal.es.ORCID 0000-0002-6886-154X
Universidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human hearing adapts to background noise, as evidenced by the fact that listeners recognize more isolated words when words are presented later rather than earlier in noise. This adaptation likely occurs because the leading noise shifts ("adapts") the dynamic range of auditory neurons, which can improve the neural encoding of speech spectral and temporal cues. Because neural dynamic range adaptation depends on stimulus-level statistics, here we investigated the importance of "statistical" adaptation for improving speech recognition in noisy backgrounds. We compared the recognition of noised-masked words in the presence and in the absence of adapting noise precursors whose level was either constant or was changing every 50 ms according to different statistical distributions. Adaptation was measured for 28 listeners (9 men) and was quantified as the recognition improvement in the precursor relative to the no-precursor condition. Adaptation was largest for constant-level precursors and did not occur for highly fluctuating precursors, even when the two types of precursors had the same mean level and both activated the medial olivocochlear reflex. Instantaneous amplitude compression of the highly fluctuating precursor produced as much adaptation as the constant-level precursor did without compression. Together, results suggest that noise adaptation in speech recognition is probably mediated by neural dynamic range adaptation to the most frequent sound level. Further, they suggest that auditory peripheral compression per se, rather than the medial olivocochlear reflex, could facilitate noise adaptation by reducing the level fluctuations in the noise.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalNoiseAdultAuditory ThresholdFemaleHumansMaleNeuronsSignal-To-Noise RatioSpeech PerceptionYoung Adultauditory compressiondynamic range adaptationmedial olivocochlear reflexspeech recognitionstatistical adaptation

Identifiers

PMID32680938
PMCPMC7486663
OpenAlexW3043072250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.