Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32680530›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2020

Relying on more sense for enhancing lower limb prostheses control: a review.

Michael Tschiedel, Michael Friedrich Russold, Eugenijus Kaniusas

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael TschiedelResearch Group Biomedical Sensing, TU Wien, Institute of Electrodynamics, Microwave and Circuit Engineering, Vienna, 1040, Austria. michael@tschiedel.at.ORCID 0000-0001-6265-8172
Michael Friedrich RussoldGlobal Research, Ottobock Healthcare Products GmbH, Vienna, 1110, Austria.
Eugenijus KaniusasResearch Group Biomedical Sensing, TU Wien, Institute of Electrodynamics, Microwave and Circuit Engineering, Vienna, 1040, Austria.
TU Wien · ATOttobock (Austria) · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern lower limb prostheses have the capability to replace missing body parts and improve the patients' quality of life. However, missing environmental information often makes a seamless adaptation to transitions between different forms of locomotion challenging. The aim of this review is to identify the progress made in this area over the last decade, addressing two main questions: which types of novel sensors for environmental awareness are used in lower limb prostheses, and how do they enhance device control towards more comfort and safety. A literature search was conducted on two Internet databases, PubMed and IEEE Xplore. Based on the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, 32 papers were selected for the review analysis, 18 of those are related to explicit environmental sensing and 14 to implicit environmental sensing. Characteristics were discussed with a focus on update rate and resolution as well as on computing power and energy consumption. Our analysis identified numerous state-of-the-art sensors, some of which are able to "look through" clothing or cosmetic covers. Five control categories were identified, how "next generation prostheses" could be extended. There is a clear tendency towards more upcoming object or terrain prediction concepts using all types of distance and depth-based sensors. Other advanced strategies, such as bilateral gait segmentation from unilateral sensors, could also play an important role in movement-dependent control applications. The studies demonstrated promising accuracy in well-controlled laboratory settings, but it is unclear how the systems will perform in real-world environments, both indoors and outdoors. At the moment the main limitation proves to be the necessity of having an unobstructed field of view.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsWearable Electronic DevicesHumansLocomotionArtificial limbContralateralEnvironmentLocomotion mode estimationProsthesis controlSystematic reviewTerrain

Identifiers

PMID32680530
PMCPMC7368691
OpenAlexW3043727535

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.