ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020
Histopathological distinction of non-invasive and invasive bladder cancers using machine learning approaches.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A multi-modal approach for decision making in bladder cancer.Nature reviews. Urology · 2026Review
- Use of Artificial Intelligence Model Associated with Masson's Trichrome Staining as a Predictor of Muscle Invasion in Bladder Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Biological feature-based machine learning in histopathological images: a systematic review.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Explainable Computational Imaging for Precision Oncology: An Interpretable Deep Learning Framework for Bladder Cancer Histopathology Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Multi-institutional validation of AI models for classifying urothelial neoplasms in digital pathology.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Bladder Cancer: A Review.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Pathology-based deep learning features for predicting basal and luminal subtypes in bladder cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Targeting ketone body metabolism in mitigating gemcitabine resistance.JCI insight · 2024Article
- Precise grading of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with multi-scale pyramidal CNN.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Uropathology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Prediction of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer recurrence using deep learning of pathology image.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A New Method of Artificial-Intelligence-Based Automatic Identification of Lymphovascular Invasion in Urothelial Carcinomas.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Machine Learning-Driven Virtual Biopsy System For Kidney Transplant Patients.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence application in the diagnosis and treatment of bladder cancer: advance, challenges, and opportunities.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Machine learning approaches for spatial omics data analysis in digital pathology: tools and applications in genitourinary oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- The classification of the bladder cancer based on Vision Transformers (ViT).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Bladder Cancer: Hype or Hope? A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Pesticides and Bladder Cancer: Mechanisms Leading to Anti-Cancer Drug Chemoresistance and New Chemosensitization Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Advanced Diagnosis of Bladder Cancer-Comprehensive Literature Review and Future Advancement.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOne of the most challenging tasks for bladder cancer diagnosis is to histologically differentiate two early stages, non-invasive Ta and superficially invasive T1, the latter of which is associated with a significantly higher risk of disease progression. Indeed, in a considerable number of cases, Ta and T1 tumors look very similar under microscope, making the distinction very difficult even for experienced pathologists. Thus, there is an urgent need for a favoring system based on machine learning (ML) to distinguish between the two stages of bladder cancer.
methodsA total of 1177 images of bladder tumor tissues stained by hematoxylin and eosin were collected by pathologists at University of Rochester Medical Center, which included 460 non-invasive (stage Ta) and 717 invasive (stage T1) tumors. Automatic pipelines were developed to extract features for three invasive patterns characteristic to the T1 stage bladder cancer (i.e., desmoplastic reaction, retraction artifact, and abundant pinker cytoplasm), using imaging processing software ImageJ and CellProfiler. Features extracted from the images were analyzed by a suite of machine learning approaches.
resultsWe extracted nearly 700 features from the Ta and T1 tumor images. Unsupervised clustering analysis failed to distinguish hematoxylin and eosin images of Ta vs. T1 tumors. With a reduced set of features, we successfully distinguished 1177 Ta or T1 images with an accuracy of 91-96% by six supervised learning methods. By contrast, convolutional neural network (CNN) models that automatically extract features from images produced an accuracy of 84%, indicating that feature extraction driven by domain knowledge outperforms CNN-based automatic feature extraction. Further analysis revealed that desmoplastic reaction was more important than the other two patterns, and the number and size of nuclei of tumor cells were the most predictive features.
conclusionsWe provide a ML-empowered, feature-centered, and interpretable diagnostic system to facilitate the accurate staging of Ta and T1 diseases, which has a potential to apply to other types of cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.