Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32680491›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Health professionals' perceptions of colorectal cancer patients' treatment burden and their supportive work to ameliorate the burden - a qualitative study.

Anne Marie Lunde Husebø, Bjørg Karlsen, Sissel Eikeland Husebø

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Addressing colon cancer patients' needs during follow-up consultations at the outpatient clinic: a multicenter qualitative observational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The needs of colorectal cancer patients/survivors: A narrative review.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Resilience and Counseling Received by Colorectal Cancer Patients During a 1-Year Follow-Up: PHASE II of a Longitudinal Study.Gastroenterology nursing : the official journal of the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anne Marie Lunde HusebøDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, N-4019, Stavanger, Norway. anne.m.husebo@uis.no.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7476-851X
Bjørg KarlsenDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway.
Sissel Eikeland HusebøDepartment of Quality and Health Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway.
Stavanger University Hospital · NOUniversity of Stavanger · NO

Funding

Western Norway Regional Health Authority HV912147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSupport is pivotal for patients in managing colorectal cancer treatment, as they might be overwhelmed by the burden of treatment. There is scarce knowledge regarding health professionals' perceptions of colorectal cancer patients' burdens and supportive needs. The study aims to describe health professionals' perspectives on treatment burden among patients receiving curative surgical treatment for colorectal cancer during the hospital stay and how they support patients to ameliorate the burden.

methodsThis study has a descriptive and explorative qualitative design, using semi-structured interviews with nine health professionals recruited from a gastrointestinal-surgery ward at a university hospital in Norway. Data were analysed by using systematic text condensation.

resultsData analysis identified the themes "capturing patients' burdens of colorectal cancer treatment" and "health professionals' support to ameliorate the burden". Patients with colorectal cancer had to face burdens related to a challenging emotional situation, treatment complications and side effects, and an extensive need for information. A trusting patient-carer relationship was therefore perceived as the essence of health professionals' support. Health professionals focused their support on safeguarding patients, motivating patients to self-manage, and involving family and peers as supporters. Patients' journey characteristics and illness severity challenged health professionals' supportive work.

conclusionSupport from health professionals includes providing patients emotional support and relevant treatment-related information and motivating patients for early post-surgical mobilisation. Health professionals should be aware of identifying colorectal cancer patients' information needs according to the specific treatment stages, which may ameliorate the burden of colorectal cancer treatment and enable patients to self-manage.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCost of IllnessHealth PersonnelProfessional-Patient RelationsAdultColorectal NeoplasmsEmotionsFemaleHospitals, UniversityHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPatientsQualitative ResearchSelf-ManagementBurden of treatmentColorectal cancerHealth professionalsNursingSelf-managementSemi-structured interviewSupport

Identifiers

PMID32680491
PMCPMC7367378
OpenAlexW3042274027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.