Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32680483›Full record

Observational studyBMC cancer2020

Treatment patterns and health outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with targeted systemic therapies in the UK.

Robert Hawkins, Kate Fife, Michael Hurst, Meng Wang, Niroshini Naicker, Sarah Nolasco, Tim Eisen, Athena Matakidou, Jason Gordon

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Treatments for renal cell carcinoma: NICE Pilot Treatment Pathways Appraisal.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Robert HawkinsUniversity of Manchester and The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK. robert.e.hawkins@manchester.ac.uk.
Kate FifeCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Michael HurstHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK.
Meng WangBristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Uxbridge, UK.
Niroshini NaickerBristol Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Uxbridge, UK.
Sarah NolascoCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Tim EisenUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Athena MatakidouUniversity of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jason GordonHealth Economics and Outcomes Research Ltd, Cardiff, UK.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United Kingdom) · GBCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBHealth Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with targeted systemic therapies have demonstrated favourable outcomes in randomised controlled trials, however real-world evidence is limited. Thus, this study aimed to determine the effectiveness of targeted systemic therapies for patients with mRCC in routine clinical practice in the UK.

methodsA retrospective, observational, longitudinal study based on chart review of newly diagnosed adult mRCC patients treated at two UK hospitals from 2008 to 2015 was conducted. Targeted systemic therapies recommended for use in mRCC patients were evaluated across first to third lines of therapy (1LOT-3LOT). Important exclusions were treatment with cytokine therapy and within non-standard of care clinical trials. Primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS); data were analysed descriptively and using Kaplan-Meyer analysis.

results652 patients (65.3% male, 35.0% ≥70 years) were included. In 1LOT, 98.5% of patients received sunitinib or pazopanib. In 2LOT and 3LOT, 99.0 and 94.4% received axitinib or everolimus. Median OS was 12.9, 6.5 and 5.9 months at 1LOT, 2LOT and 3LOT respectively. Estimated OS at 1-year was 52.4% (95% CI: 48.6-56.4%) in 1LOT, 31.5% (25.2-39.5%) in 2LOT and 23.8% (10.1-55.9%) in 3LOT. Median OS from 1LOT in favourable, intermediate and poor MSKCC were 39.7, 15.8 and 6.1 months respectively.

conclusionsIn this study, treatment was consistent with current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for mRCC patients. Although the study population favoured poorer prognosis patients, outcomes were more favourable than those for England at the same time. However, overall survival in this 'real-world' population remains poor and indicates significant unmet need for effective and safe treatment options to improve survival among mRCC patients.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsAxitinibCarcinoma, Renal CellEverolimusFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndazolesKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney NeoplasmsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsAxitinibEverolimusIndazolespazopanibProtein Kinase InhibitorsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesSunitinibMolecular targeted therapyRenal CancerSurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID32680483
PMCPMC7368711
OpenAlexW3042628409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.