Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32680462›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2020

Cognitive and sensorimotor function in participants being treated for trigeminal neuralgia pain.

Rachel O Coats, Kirsty L Crossley, Naomi Conlin, Jianhua Wu, Joanna M Zakrzewska, Sue H Pavitt, Nicholas Phillips, Mark Mon-Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel O CoatsSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. r.o.a.coats@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4415-408X
Kirsty L CrossleySchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Naomi ConlinSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Jianhua WuSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Joanna M ZakrzewskaRoyal ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals, University College London, London, UK.
Sue H PavittSchool of Dentistry, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Nicholas PhillipsLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Mark Mon-WilliamsSchool of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
University of Leeds · GBLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

Trigeminal Neuralgia Association UK 114326
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrigeminal neuralgia (TN) is an orofacial condition defined by reoccurring, spontaneous, short-lived but excruciating stabbing pain. Pharmacological interventions constitute the first-line treatment for TN, with antiepileptic drugs commonly prescribed. People treated for TN pain with antiepileptic drugs describe cognitive and motor difficulties affecting activities of daily living, and report poorer quality of life. We undertook the first comprehensive objective evaluation of sensorimotor and cognitive performance in participants being treated for TN pain with antiepileptic drugs relative to age-matched controls.

methodsParticipants (43 TN, 41 control) completed a battery of sensorimotor (steering, aiming and tracking) and cognitive (working memory, processing speed, inhibition) tasks.

resultsThe TN group performed significantly worse than controls on the sensorimotor tracking and aiming tasks and across all cognitive measures.

conclusionsThe data explain why patients treated with antiepileptic drugs report impairment when conducting activities of daily living (given the need for cognitive and motor capability within most of these). The study is an important first step in: (i) ensuring there is adequate information on the impact of pharmacological treatment; (ii) identifying measures to determine optimal medication dosage and track change over time; (iii) creating an evidence base that could allow scientific justification of alternative pain treatment options for TN (e.g. the costs/benefits of surgery).

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticonvulsantsCognitionFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPainPain ManagementPsychomotor PerformanceQuality of LifeReaction TimeTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsCognitiveImpairmentPain medicationSensorimotorTrigeminal neuralgia

Identifiers

PMID32680462
PMCPMC7367337
OpenAlexW3042430681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.