Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32680459›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2020

Dynamic light caused less photosynthetic suppression, rather than more, under nitrogen deficit conditions than under sufficient nitrogen supply conditions in soybean.

Yu-Ting Li, Ying Li, Yue-Nan Li, Ying Liang, Qiang Sun, Geng Li, Peng Liu, Zi-Shan Zhang, Hui-Yuan Gao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impacts of Elevated COPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yu-Ting LiState Key Lab of Crop Biology, Tai'an, Shandong Province, China.
Ying LiState Key Lab of Crop Biology, Tai'an, Shandong Province, China.
Yue-Nan LiState Key Lab of Crop Biology, Tai'an, Shandong Province, China.
Ying LiangState Key Lab of Crop Biology, Tai'an, Shandong Province, China.
Qiang SunTai'an Testing Center For Food And Drug Control, Tai'an, Shandong Province, China.
Geng LiState Key Lab of Crop Biology, Tai'an, Shandong Province, China. ligeng213@163.com.
Peng LiuState Key Lab of Crop Biology, Tai'an, Shandong Province, China. liupengsdau@126.com.
Zi-Shan ZhangState Key Lab of Crop Biology, Tai'an, Shandong Province, China. zhangzishantaian@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2197-8660
Hui-Yuan GaoState Key Lab of Crop Biology, Tai'an, Shandong Province, China.
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPlants are always exposed to dynamic light. The photosynthetic light use efficiency of leaves is lower in dynamic light than in uniform irradiance. Research on the influence of environmental factors on dynamic photosynthesis is very limited. Nitrogen is critical for plants, especially for photosynthesis. Low nitrogen (LN) decreases ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) and thus limits photosynthesis. The decrease in Rubisco also delays photosynthetic induction in LN leaves; therefore, we hypothesized that the difference of photosynthetic CO

resultsTo test this hypothesis, soybean plants were grown under low or high nitrogen (HN), and the photosynthetic gas exchange, enzyme activity and protein amount in leaves were measured under uniform and dynamic light. Unexpectedly, dynamic light caused less photosynthetic suppression, rather than more, in LN leaves than in HN leaves. The underlying mechanism was also clarified. Short low-light (LL) intervals did not affect Rubisco activity but clearly deactivated fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase) and sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (SBPase), indicating that photosynthetic induction after a LL interval depends on the reactivation of FBPase and SBPase rather than Rubisco. In LN leaves, the amount of Rubisco decreased more than FBPase and SBPase, so FBPase and SBPase were present in relative excess. A lower fraction of FBPase and SBPase needs to be activated in LN leaves for photosynthesis recovery during the high-light phase of dynamic light. Therefore, photosynthetic recovery is faster in LN leaves than in HN leaves, which relieves the photosynthetic suppression caused by dynamic light in LN leaves.

conclusionsContrary to our expectations, dynamic light caused less photosynthetic suppression, rather than more, in LN leaves than in HN leaves of soybean. This is the first report of a stress condition alleviating the photosynthetic suppression caused by dynamic light.

Indexed as

Glycine maxLightNitrogenPhotosynthesisPlant LeavesRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseStress, PhysiologicalNitrogenRibulose-Bisphosphate CarboxylaseDynamic lightLow nitrogenPhotosynthesisSoybean

Identifiers

PMID32680459
PMCPMC7368695
OpenAlexW3042417348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.