Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32680442›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2021

Nanoparticle-Based Estrogen Delivery to Spinal Cord Injury Site Reduces Local Parenchymal Destruction and Improves Functional Recovery.

April Cox, Mollie Capone, Denise Matzelle, Alexey Vertegel, Mikhail Bredikhin, Abhay Varma, Azizul Haque, Donald C Shields, Naren L Banik

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. AAD-2004 through clearing HScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches for Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

April CoxDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Mollie CaponeDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Denise MatzelleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Alexey VertegelDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.
Mikhail BredikhinDepartment of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA.
Abhay VarmaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Azizul HaqueDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Donald C ShieldsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Naren L BanikDepartment of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USClemson University · USRalph H. Johnson VA Medical Center · US

Funding

BLRD VA I01 BX001262BLRD VA I01 BX002349BLRD VA I01 BX004269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) patients sustain significant functional impairments; this is causally related to restricted neuronal regeneration after injury. The ensuing reactive gliosis, inflammatory cascade, and glial scar formation impede axonal regrowth. Although systemic anti-inflammatory agents (steroids) have been previously administered to counteract this, no current therapeutic is approved for post-injury neuronal regeneration, in part because of related side effects. Likewise, therapeutic systemic estrogen levels exhibit neuroprotective properties, but dose-dependent side effects are prohibitive. The current study thus uses low-dose estrogen delivery to the spinal cord injury (SCI) site using an agarose gel patch embedded with estrogen-loaded nanoparticles. Compared to controls, spinal cords from rodents treated with nanoparticle site-directed estrogen demonstrated significantly decreased post-injury lesion size, reactive gliosis, and glial scar formation. However, axonal regeneration, vascular endothelial growth factor production, and glial-cell-derived neurotrophic factor levels were increased with estrogen administration. Concomitantly improved locomotor and bladder functional recovery were observed with estrogen administration after injury. Therefore, low-dose site-directed estrogen may provide a future approach for enhanced neuronal repair and functional recovery in SCI patients.

Indexed as

NanoparticlesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEstradiolEstrogensGliosisMaleNerve RegenerationParenchymal TissueRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRecovery of FunctionSpinal Cord InjuriesEstradiolEstrogensestrogennanoparticleneuronal regenerationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID32680442
PMCPMC11864116
OpenAlexW3042612178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.