Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32679861›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Forecasting Covid-19 Dynamics in Brazil: A Data Driven Approach.

Igor Gadelha Pereira, Joris Michel Guerin, Andouglas Gonçalves Silva Júnior, Gabriel Santos Garcia, Prisco Piscitelli, Alessandro Miani, Cosimo Distante, Luiz Marcos Garcia Gonçalves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Framework for Inferring Epidemiological Model Parameters using Bayesian Nonparametrics.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Igor Gadelha PereiraDepartment of Computer Engineering and Automation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7539-4663
Joris Michel GuerinDepartment of Computer Engineering and Automation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8048-8960
Andouglas Gonçalves Silva JúniorDepartment of Computer Engineering and Automation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0579-8464
Gabriel Santos GarciaInstitute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Distrito Federal 70910-900, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-8014-8659
Prisco PiscitelliEuro Mediterranean Scientific Biomedical Institute (ISBEM), 1040 Bruxelles, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4556-6182
Alessandro MianiDepartment of Environmental Sciences and Policy, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3534-1553
Cosimo DistanteInstitute of Applied Sciences and Intelligent Systems, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1073-2390
Luiz Marcos Garcia GonçalvesDepartment of Computer Engineering and Automation, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal 59078-970, RN, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7735-5630

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 311640/2018-4Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, a new data driven approach for predicting the Covid-19 pandemic dynamics is introduced. The second contribution consists in reporting and discussing the results that were obtained with this approach for the Brazilian states, with predictions starting as of 4 May 2020. As a preliminary study, we first used an Long Short Term Memory for Data Training-SAE (LSTM-SAE) network model. Although this first approach led to somewhat disappointing results, it served as a good baseline for testing other ANN types. Subsequently, in order to identify relevant countries and regions to be used for training ANN models, we conduct a clustering of the world's regions where the pandemic is at an advanced stage. This clustering is based on manually engineered features representing a country's response to the early spread of the pandemic, and the different clusters obtained are used to select the relevant countries for training the models. The final models retained are Modified Auto-Encoder networks, that are trained on these clusters and learn to predict future data for Brazilian states. These predictions are used to estimate important statistics about the disease, such as peaks and number of confirmed cases. Finally, curve fitting is carried out to find the distribution that best fits the outputs of the MAE, and to refine the estimates of the peaks of the pandemic. Predicted numbers reach a total of more than one million infected Brazilians, distributed among the different states, with São Paulo leading with about 150 thousand confirmed cases predicted. The results indicate that the pandemic is still growing in Brazil, with most states peaks of infection estimated in the second half of May 2020. The estimated end of the pandemics (97% of cases reaching an outcome) spread between June and the end of August 2020, depending on the states.

Indexed as

BetacoronavirusBrazilCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19ForecastingHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Covid-19 pandemicdata-drivenmodified auto-encodertime series prediction

Identifiers

PMID32679861
PMCPMC7400194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.