ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Antibacterial Drug Development: A New Approach Is Needed for the Field to Survive and Thrive.
Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- CoMPHI: a novel composite machine learning approach utilizing multiple feature representation to predict hosts of bacteriophages.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Antimicrobial activity in Asterceae: The selected genera characterization and against multidrug resistance bacteria.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Evaluation of the efficacy of the antimicrobial peptide HJH-3 in chickens infected withFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Benefits of Combined Phage-Antibiotic Therapy for the Control of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria: A Literature Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The importance of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in antimicrobial drug development and their influence on the success of agents developed to combat resistant gram negative pathogens: A review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Improved bactericidal efficacy and thermostability of Staphylococcus aureus-specific bacteriophage SA3821 by repeated sodium pyrophosphate challenges.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Anti-phage serum antibody responses and the outcome of phage therapy.Folia microbiologica · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It is often said that the marketplace for new antibiotics is broken. This notion is supported by the observation that many recently-approved antibiotics to treat drug-resistant bacteria have failed commercially in a spectacular fashion. Today, companies with peak market-cap values in excess of USD 500 million to 1 billion prior to product launch regularly sell for pennies on the dollar a few years after market introduction. It is possible, however, that the market is not as broken as we perceive. That is, in the collective mind of the clinician, recently-approved antibiotics may be too-poorly differentiated to justify their broad use and inordinate cost relative to those already existing. Perhaps we in the antibacterial drug development field must change our way of thinking if we are to survive and thrive. Rather than reflexively developing new β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for every new enzyme that evades our current inhibitors, we should focus discovery and development efforts on agents that revolutionize how we potentiate antibiotics. To this end, there has been renewed interest in phage therapies, virulence inhibitors, bacterial growth rate modulators, monoclonal antibodies, and other approaches to augment antibiotic effects. Herein, we suggest that the unmet medical need is less about adding poorly-differentiated antibiotics to our armamentarium and more about the need for innovation in how we augment antibiotic regimen effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.