Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32679639›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

The Potential of Insects as Alternative Sources of Chitin: An Overview on the Chemical Method of Extraction from Various Sources.

Nurul Alyani Zainol Abidin, Faridah Kormin, Nurul Akhma Zainol Abidin, Nor Aini Fatihah Mohamed Anuar, Mohd Fadzelly Abu Bakar

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 217 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comprehensive Research Progress on Glucosamine: A Review.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Facile and green synthesis of α-FeScientific reports · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Investigation of 9 True Weevil (Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nurul Alyani Zainol AbidinFaculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3836-7647
Faridah KorminFaculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia.
Nurul Akhma Zainol AbidinFaculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia.
Nor Aini Fatihah Mohamed AnuarFaculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia.
Mohd Fadzelly Abu BakarFaculty of Applied Sciences and Technology, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, Johor 86400, Malaysia.
Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia · MY

Funding

GPPS, Research Management Centre (RMC), Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia H052Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia K104Tier 1, Research Management Centre (RMC), Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia H256
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chitin, being the second most abundant biopolymer after cellulose, has been gaining popularity since its initial discovery by Braconot in 1811. However, fundamental knowledge and literature on chitin and its derivatives from insects are difficult to obtain. The most common and sought-after sources of chitin are shellfish (especially crustaceans) and other aquatic invertebrates. The amount of shellfish available is obviously restricted by the amount of food waste that is allowed; hence, it is a limited resource. Therefore, insects are the best choices since, out of 1.3 million species in the world, 900,000 are insects, making them the most abundant species in the world. In this review, a total of 82 samples from shellfish-crustaceans and mollusks (n = 46), insects (n = 23), and others (n = 13)-have been collected and studied for their chemical extraction of chitin and its derivatives. The aim of this paper is to review the extraction method of chitin and chitosan for a comparison of the optimal demineralization and deproteinization processes, with a consideration of insects as alternative sources of chitin. The methods employed in this review are based on comprehensive bibliographic research. Based on previous data, the chitin and chitosan contents of insects in past studies favorably compare and compete with those of commercial chitin and chitosan-for example, 45% in

Indexed as

AnimalsChemical FractionationChitinChitosanCrustaceaInsectaMolluscaRefuse DisposalChitinChitosanchemical extractionchitinchitosandemineralizationdeproteinization

Identifiers

PMID32679639
PMCPMC7404258
OpenAlexW3042856276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.