Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32679065›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2020

A Manually Curated Database on Clinical Studies Involving Cell Products Derived from Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Sabine Kobold, Anke Guhr, Nancy Mah, Nils Bultjer, Stefanie Seltmann, Andrea E M Seiler Wulczyn, Glyn Stacey, Hao Jie, Wang Liu, Peter Löser and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabine KoboldRobert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Anke GuhrRobert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Nancy MahBCRT - Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Nils BultjerBCRT - Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Stefanie SeltmannBCRT - Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Andrea E M Seiler WulczynRobert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Glyn StaceyInternational Stem Cell Banking Initiative, 2 High Street, Barley, Herts SG8 8HZ, UK; National Stem Cell Resource Centre, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; Innovation Academy for Stem Cell and Regeneration, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.
Hao JieNational Stem Cell Resource Centre, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Wang LiuNational Stem Cell Resource Centre, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Peter LöserRobert Koch Institute, Nordufer 20, 13353 Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: loeserp@rki.de.
Andreas KurtzBCRT - Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies, Berlin-Brandenburg Center for Regenerative Therapies, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany; International Stem Cell Banking Initiative, 2 High Street, Barley, Herts SG8 8HZ, UK. Electronic address: andreas.kurtz@charite.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DERobert Koch Institute · DEChinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitute of Zoology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last 5 years have witnessed a significant increase in the number of clinical studies based on human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). In parallel, concern is increasing about the proliferation of unregulated stem cell treatments worldwide. Regulated clinical testing is a de facto standard to establish the safety and efficacy of new cell therapies, yet reliable information on clinical studies involving hPSCs is scattered. Our analysis of a multitude of resources found 54 clinical studies involving several types of hPSCs, which are performed in ten countries. While the majority of those studies is based on human embryonic stem cells (hESCs), clinical studies involving human induced pluripotent stem cells increased more strongly in the past 2 years than the number of hESC-based studies. A publicly accessible database was created using the human pluripotent stem cell registry (https://hpscreg.eu) platform, providing a steadily updated comprehensive overview on hPSC-based clinical studies performed worldwide.

Indexed as

Databases as TopicData CurationCell LineClinical Trials as TopicHuman Embryonic Stem CellsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsTime Factorsclinical study databaseembryonic stem cellpluripotent stem cell

Identifiers

PMID32679065
PMCPMC7419703
OpenAlexW3043334872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.