Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32678879›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2021

CODEL: phase III study of RT, RT + TMZ, or TMZ for newly diagnosed 1p/19q codeleted oligodendroglioma. Analysis from the initial study design.

Kurt A Jaeckle, Karla V Ballman, Martin van den Bent, Caterina Giannini, Evanthia Galanis, Paul D Brown, Robert B Jenkins, J Gregory Cairncross, Wolfgang Wick, Michael Weller and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Central Nervous System Tumors in Adolescents and Young Adults.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 15 institutions in 6 countries.

Kurt A JaeckleDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Karla V BallmanAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Martin van den BentBrain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Center, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Caterina GianniniDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Evanthia GalanisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Paul D BrownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Robert B JenkinsDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
J Gregory CairncrossDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Wolfgang WickNeurologische Klinik, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael WellerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Kenneth D AldapeDepartment of Neuropathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jesse G DixonAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
S Keith AndersonAlliance Statistics and Data Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jane H CerhanDepartments of Psychiatry and Psychology, Houston, Texas, USA.
Jeffrey S WefelDepartments of Neuro-Oncology and Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Martin KleinDepartment of Medical Psychology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Stuart A GrossmanDepartment of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
David SchiffDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA.
Jeffrey J RaizerDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Frederick DhermainDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Gustave Roussy Cancer Institute, Villejuif, France.
Donald G NordstromMedical Oncology, France Abben Cancer Center, Spencer, Iowa, USA.
Patrick J FlynnMedical Oncology, Minnesota Oncology, Northfield, Minnesota, USA.
Michael A VogelbaumDepartment of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Mayo Clinic · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLCleveland Clinic · USCornell University · USErasmus MC · NLHeidelberg University · DEInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRJacksonville College · USMinnesota Oncology · USNorthwestern University · USSidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Virginia · USUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
Statistics CoreU10CA180882 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Sumithra Jay Mandrekar · 2014 to 2026
$115.0M
NCIC Clinical Trials Group - Canadian Collaborating Clinical Trials NetworkU10CA180863 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI Janet Ellen Dancey · 2014 to 2026
$40.4M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP) UG1UG1CA233329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KELLY K HUNT, CHELSEA Camille PINNIX · 2019 to 2026
$11.1M
OSU as a Network Lead Academic Participating Site for the NCI NCTNUG1CA233331 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI John L. Hays, Dwight H. Owen · 2019 to 2026
$8.9M
NCI, National Clinical Trials Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAPS) UG1 (funded extension)UG1CA232760 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Judy Caroline Boughey, Aaron Scott Mansfield · 2019 to 2026
$8.5M
Development and validation of a predictor of meningioma recurrenceZIABC011847 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI ALDAPE, KENNETH · 2018 to 2025
$5.9M
Northwestern University Lead Academic Participating Site Supplement Year 2UG1CA233320 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI BENSON, AL B, MATEI, DANIELA E · 2019 to 2025
$5.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180863NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180882NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA232760NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233320NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233329NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe report the analysis involving patients treated on the initial CODEL design.

methodsAdults (>18) with newly diagnosed 1p/19q World Health Organization (WHO) grade III oligodendroglioma were randomized to radiotherapy (RT; 5940 centigray ) alone (arm A); RT with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) (arm B); or TMZ alone (arm C). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), arm A versus B. Secondary comparisons were performed for OS and progression-free survival (PFS), comparing pooled RT arms versus TMZ-alone arm.

resultsThirty-six patients were randomized equally. At median follow-up of 7.5 years, 83.3% (10/12) TMZ-alone patients progressed, versus 37.5% (9/24) on the RT arms. PFS was significantly shorter in TMZ-alone patients compared with RT patients (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.12; 95% CI: 1.26, 7.69; P = 0.014). Death from disease progression occurred in 3/12 (25%) of TMZ-alone patients and 4/24 (16.7%) on the RT arms. OS did not statistically differ between arms (comparison underpowered). After adjustment for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) status (mutated/wildtype) in a Cox regression model utilizing IDH and RT treatment status as covariables (arm C vs pooled arms A + B), PFS remained shorter for patients not receiving RT (HR = 3.33; 95% CI: 1.31, 8.45; P = 0.011), but not OS ((HR = 2.78; 95% CI: 0.58, 13.22, P = 0.20). Grade 3+ adverse events occurred in 25%, 42%, and 33% of patients (arms A, B, and C). There were no differences between arms in neurocognitive decline comparing baseline to 3 months.

conclusionsTMZ-alone patients experienced significantly shorter PFS than patients treated on the RT arms. The ongoing CODEL trial has been redesigned to compare RT + PCV versus RT + TMZ.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsOligodendrogliomaAdultHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseProgression-Free SurvivalTemozolomideIsocitrate DehydrogenaseTemozolomide1p/19qCODELcodeletedN0577oligodendroglioma

Identifiers

PMID32678879
PMCPMC7992874
OpenAlexW3043701315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.